Nhl 24 the game for everyone and anyone.
This used to be a game that took skill to be good at. Many of us have spent decades trying to master the skills to get where we are now. It's more than obvious that EA have given up on us loyal fan...
Forum Discussion
@EA_Aljo"actively hate" I don't actively hate it, I actively don't like the direction the series is in.
In 6s especially the skill gap in this game isn't the game itself it's the human controlled players hockey iq. The reason the good teams and I use that term loosely as I don't really believe even the best teams are better than their forces. (I used a 6'9 enforcer vs the top line of lg avalanche and we destroyed them so my personal experience backs that up.)
The issue is that it's not really skill gap it's a skill wave. If you have 5 guys that are competent at the game, you have a shot vs anyone. Which absolutely should not be the case. As you will get 2 or 3 goals off of nonsense that don't feel good to score.
The higher you get in division the more cheesy people play. Take advantage of worse players decision making while making the less skilled play because they know it will work. Etc Etc.
I could go on for an hour.
The addiction is to the series itself. Them making bad changes that I vocally want them to change doesn't change that. Am I supposed to not be vocal about and just shut up and play my games? No I'm going to constructively criticize while being told "It's just the way it is adapt" No thank you.
@llamaverox wrote:
If you have 5 guys that are competent at the game, you have a shot vs anyone. Which absolutely should not be the case. As you will get 2 or 3 goals off of nonsense that don't feel good to score.
This makes no sense. Why should a team with 1 player deemed 'not competent' be instantly dismissed and not have a chance against anyone?
@llamaverox wrote:
The higher you get in division the more cheesy people play. Take advantage of worse players decision making while making the less skilled play because they know it will work. Etc Etc.
Taking advantage of "worse players' decision making" is considered cheesy?
@llamaverox wrote:Am I supposed to not be vocal about and just shut up and play my games? No I'm going to constructively criticize whole being told "It's just the way it is adapt" No thank you.
You absolutely should not just shut up and play without being critical of things you deem to need work. Keep it coming.
However, when someone is simply trying to explain to you how you can utilize the mechanic you want in a different way to get the same exact outcome you desire, you should listen to them and practice the advice rather than just hating because it's not the answer you want.
@KidShowtime1867 wrote:
@llamaverox wrote:
If you have 5 guys that are competent at the game, you have a shot vs anyone. Which absolutely should not be the case. As you will get 2 or 3 goals off of nonsense that don't feel good to score."This makes no sense. Why should a team with 1 player deemed 'not competent' be instantly dismissed and not have a chance against anyone?"
A misunderstanding of what I said.
I'm saying that my teams are generally full of guys that aren't great at the game. We still win against world class playoff winning teams because we just are able to force cheese plays all game. It's not right. My teams should lose 6-0 against some of these teams but because the game allows offense to do whatever it wants, games end up 3-4 or some other nonsense.
I used a 6'9 enforcer where I alone was able to dominate because of the way the game uses height and weight. I was the same speed as everyone else at 86 because my stride lengths were longer I could literally win faceoffs to myself.
That is to say. The game should have a skill gap based on mechanics not just whether you can cheese the game better.
@llamaverox wrote:
The higher you get in division the more cheesy people play. Take advantage of worse players decision making while making the less skilled play because they know it will work. Etc Etc."Taking advantage of "worse players' decision making" is considered cheesy?"
Misunderstood what I said. I said, take advantage of worse decision making while making a cheesy play.
I want high skill teams to win 8-1. I don't want them doing that because they forced a pass through 3 guys that won't stand on the one-t's stick.
Featured Places
