Nhl 24 the game for everyone and anyone.
This used to be a game that took skill to be good at. Many of us have spent decades trying to master the skills to get where we are now. It's more than obvious that EA have given up on us loyal fan...
Forum Discussion
Hypothetical scenarios being conjured up to allegedly demonstrate how bad the a.i. is just isn't going to get us anywhere. I understand you're pitting CPU v CPU and then generating feedback on the forecheck based on that but why would you do that when cpu v cpu means literally nothing?
You're omitting the human element completely.
@Limp_KidzKit wrote:1. F1 not truly forcing the play to the strong-side
2. F2 "crashing" down on puck carrier in support of F1
3. F3 usually found standing still or doing some sort of shuffle while not bothering to cover the opponent's middle-lane forward
.
Who's controlling the F's here? What responsibility does the human have? How do attributes affect the positioning?
You're passionate about demonstrating your hockey knowledge, but you're not giving any in-game examples that actually demonstrate the erroneous a.i.
@KidShowtime1867 wrote:Hypothetical scenarios being conjured up to allegedly demonstrate how bad the a.i. is just isn't going to get us anywhere. I understand you're pitting CPU v CPU and then generating feedback on the forecheck based on that but why would you do that when cpu v cpu means literally nothing?
You're omitting the human element completely.
@Limp_KidzKit wrote:1. F1 not truly forcing the play to the strong-side
2. F2 "crashing" down on puck carrier in support of F1
3. F3 usually found standing still or doing some sort of shuffle while not bothering to cover the opponent's middle-lane forward
.Who's controlling the F's here? What responsibility does the human have? How do attributes affect the positioning?
You're passionate about demonstrating your hockey knowledge, but you're not giving any in-game examples that actually demonstrate the erroneous a.i.
The AI is doing all of these things, you just admitted that you know this to be the case. Why the rhetorical questions?
You're saying the AI are "erroneous" but that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying they are perfectly executing a flawed strategy.
I can tell 100 men to straight on rush a heavily fortified MG emplacement if I want. It will fail, but it won't be due to my men being erroneous. It will be due to my flawed strategy.
