@KlariskraysNHL wrote:
@TheUnusedCrayonYou just don't like hearing how what isn't the answer you want. When the devs had been on the forums and answered questions and people didn't like their reasons they got angry at the devs and that ended up ruining the communication here because a devs word wasn't good enough.
People are fine with the answers when they make sense. It's a tired excuse for poor communication.
I'm bringing logic to the discussion. Others are intentionally removing it and saying logic shouldn't apply to the video game. I expect higher standards for a billion dollar company to put in basic things (that already exist by the way) that make the simple things work.
It's all about vision control. Hold LT/L2 between the puck carrier and receiver. It works 9/10
If it's an active 2 on 1. The best available option is either switching to goalie or dive block.
Plenty of the examples here also work when making your opponent double think their set up approach.
Who cares right... "it's just a game!"
What a response from people who spend their time discussing and defending said game on forums. It was right in years past, how hard can it be to make it right again? Paid 100$ for this.
This replay of my friend playing as a Defensive Defenseman:
