Forum Discussion
@Treatmentworke66 wrote:Interference for this
https://youtu.be/QIV_yIBeRNs?feature=shared
Yea, you hit a player without the puck:
@llamaverox wrote:
@TTZ_DipsyWhich it should not, that is a good hit, within the window of him passing the puck, just because puck changes possession does not make that interference in real hockey it shouldn't for this game. It's why people get frustrated playing it, you play good defense the other team is bailed out and rewarded.
He hit a player without the puck.
@Treatmentworke66 wrote:@TTZ_DipsyNo I was passing the puck which shouldn't be interference
You hit a player without the puck.
@Treatmentworke66 wrote:
@TTZ_DipsyHere's some more garbage game play this is after a sauser pass
https://youtu.be/NjxwgWAkEEg
You're hitting shoot immediately after hitting pass in the hopes you get a one-timer:
If you're passing for a one-timer, don't hit shoot until you know for certain your intended recipient will actually possess the pass. The old-school method of hitting pass and instantly holding shoot will not work as effectively as in previous years and results in taking penalties like that.
@Treatmentworke66 wrote:Here's more garbage game play ,you can slam a player to the ground in front of the net but it's not interference but a simple stick lift is
https://youtu.be/G3AK6zNcwmk?feature=shared
Except it's not a simple stick lift. You're clearly holding stick-tie up on a player nowhere near the front of the net
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@KidShowtime1867 You better take a look again of where my stick is because i didn't stick lift him he did it to me nice try
- KidShowtime18672 years agoHero
@Treatmentworke66 wrote:
@KidShowtime1867You better take a look again of where my stick is because i didn't stick lift him he did it to me nice tryYou're literally in one of the stick tie-up animations:
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@KidShowtime1867 Again I didn't do anything he stick lifed me
- Treatmentworke662 years agoSeasoned Ace@KidShowtime1867 And the one with the bread man he tried checking me so I reversed hit as I was passing the puck
- thebrazenhead752 years agoRising Vanguard
The first clip shouldn’t be a penalty. It was just as the player was losing (or attempting to pass) the puck. It was clearly within the allowed time frame to hit a player after losing possession.
The second clip shouldn’t be a penalty. If anything it should be on #22 TML player for interference. After the pass was clearly made #22 skated into him and lost balance probably due to lack of balance, strength, etc.
If the first clip is a penalty for making contact with a player without possession of the puck then in the second clip it should be a penalty on #22 for making contact with a player without possession of the puck.
The third clip should be a penalty. It’s clearly obstruction by not allowing the player to move.
About NHL 24 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 5 days ago
- 2 months ago