Can someone guess the teams ratings on the image below.
Let me help you:
Maxrich: 82
Gapple Bees: 77
Hhgff: 82
Njigbers: 86
For the 7-1 win, I've downgraded my team to 82 instead of 87 as a test. So no, the team and player ratings don't matter.
@kuosikasikuus I never panic, besides I was ahead 2-0 at that point and if you're referring at when Gordie Howe is losing the puck. As far as I know cross check and shoot are not the same button.
If you can't see that I should have I scored at least 4 times on that video, I don't know what to say to you, Merry Xmas I guess 🙂
Gentlemen, come on... We just have to agree that this year's NHL is quite raising the pressure and speed of our hearts pumping :-) But let's take it as relaxing at the games :-)
@6hpy2hzsfzas I'd have to watch your game play to see why you're losing to lower rated teams but I suspect you play loser against them than the higher rated teams. Probably taking more chances too and getting caught out of position.
Your complaint is on the 10,000' level and you just can't disseminate from that large a breadth. As I posted above, you have to look closer at what you're playing against.
Generally speaking, the higher rated teams I've come across have been built with smaller more skilled players easy to knock around. The low 80OVR teams and below are built with more TWF and PWF and can match the size of TBs and tougher to knock around. The build on the lower rated cards are also wildly out of balance. They can still have high rated stats in key attributes and be nerfed in others.
The ToW squad is not balanced and you're only playing against 1 maybe 2 lines at each end of the ice. Once the top 6 FWDs & D-pair leave the ice, the other lines are fairly easy to beat if you don't make mistakes. I think the current ToW is a 92. Sounds like a powerhouse but look at the stats and you see you're playing against items with mid to low 80s in the key attributes. It's also rare that it has the more valuable Synergies activated where many players build teams with low rated cards to do just that.
@6hpy2hzsfzas wrote:@ThoorWoolf Tell me about it, I use 88 Hasek too and he's terrible against lower rated teams. Just look at this video. Very frustrating.
Good video and exactly what I said about Hasek's attributes. He gives up a top-shelf goal on a breakaway.
@6hpy2hzsfzas wrote:Here's a video of the 3-2 lost against the 77 rated team. See how the goalie is pretty much invincible. This has nothing to do with tactics.
This is another good one and shows the same thing I'm guilty of, straight lining and shooting from distance with no screen. Best bet was to dance the blueline until one of your FWDs could get position in front.
You clearly go for the reverse hit with Howe when alone in the slot and that counts as an O-zone turnover and forces your teammates to scramble to cover.
@Jeff_frm_Edmonds Good video and exactly what I said about Hasek's attributes. He gives up a top-shelf goal on a breakaway.
This is not a breakaway by the way. He didn't get passed my defenceman. He just moved to the right and shot.
where do we see.
- possible tactical errors
-your possible defense mistake.
-shot and pass mistake
etc
I'm not frustrated but I guess my tactics are good enough to easily beat those teams:
