Deception
I hate it when EA is not forthcoming about their pack content. Take the Corner Stone Player Choice pack as an example. 5 rounds. 15 cards. The odds state. 92+...23% 90+...52% 86+..93% 84+..100%. S...
Forum Discussion
Have you read the text above those probabilities? It literally says "Minimum probability of getting ONE or more players of the overall range or described category in this pack". I'm not sure how you think it looks like every card in the pack is 84+ or what they should say so that it wouldn't look like that.
Your not getting my drift. I have no problem with the odds translation. My premise was on the lack of identifying cards other than those mentioned in the breakdown. Does it give an odds for a 78 card. No! It doesn't identify the pack may contain cards other than those that are highlighted. Putting in an additional odds below 84, would at least justify the actual garbage that it contains.
It is stated very clearly that the pack contains at least ONE 84+ overall card. How does this imply that ALL cards in the pack are 84+ overall? I really don't understand what makes you think that way. One card in the pack is guaranteed to be 84+ overall, and the other cards don't have a guaranteed overall so they can be lower overall. And the odds for a 78+ overall card would be 100% so it wouldn't give any additional information. It is pretty clear that the pack is likely to contain lower than 84 overall cards even though the lower overalls aren't mentioned in the probabilities.
My point is. I have no delusions as to your trying to indicate than an 84+ card at 100%, guarantees you at least 1. That has nothing to do with what I said. They put percentages up for the 80 and above cards. Why is there not inclusivity of putting up one for cards that are below the ones mentioned. Why my quip was Deceptive. They do not say what you can expect in the pack, but according to your answer, we are to ASSUME, that there will be lower cards. Again no problem with it. But at least identify that this pack may contain cards other than those described. That would not make it not DECEPTIVE! My contention in making this statement is. It does not accurately reflect the Possible full content of the pack. If you take it for its worth, the way it is written. 84+ being the lowest card mentioned. Then by that description alone, one would have to assume that the lowest card in the pack is an 84. We all know that is not the case. But by not identifying anything other than that 80 card. They are being Deceptive. When purchasing anything, I'm sure one would want to know EXACTLY, what they are, or may be getting. Like I said. Reconstruct the odds board to mention, pack may contain cards other than those described. That leaves out you having to assume, which you should not have to. And it now becomes clarified, and not DECEPTIVE
