I've been ripped off.
can't see the arrow.
Forum Discussion
19 Replies
- I see it, that sucks. Mine will come too, I have been lucky, no cash or gift cards yet, only premium items in about 10 spins.
aljimo wrote:
can't see the arrow.
- Yeah that sucks
madfish86 wrote:
All pushes go to the house. :lol:
It's a digital representation of a wheel not an actual one and given how woefully inaccurate taps on the screen can be interpreted at times in TSTO, not really surprising.
I wonder if that's what you'll say when it happens to you.- That's because the wheel and the arrow are irrelevant. It knows whether or not you've won before you spin the thing. As soon as you use a coin, it has been decided. It's a glorified mystery box with set odds.
- While it is a bit sucky, of course the position of the pointer is not the determining factor as to what you win (like it would be on a real wheel) its merely a graphical representation of a random number generator. You probably lost out by a decimal point, which of course is no comfort at all ;)
lyle_catcliffe wrote:
beeblebrox900 wrote:
While it is a bit sucky, of course the position of the pointer is not the determining factor as to what you win (like it would be on a real wheel) its merely a graphical representation of a random number generator. You probably lost out by a decimal point, which of course is no comfort at all ;)
Jeez. It's mental the length these logic defiers will go in order to defend EA.
Agree with you here, what it shows it what you should get. I don't care that it was decided before , the graphic should match the result. If it doesn't what's the point of the game? Might as well play with 0's and 1's. And no graphics
EA should be better than that, but we all know they aren't.lyle_catcliffe wrote:
beeblebrox900 wrote:
While it is a bit sucky, of course the position of the pointer is not the determining factor as to what you win (like it would be on a real wheel) its merely a graphical representation of a random number generator. You probably lost out by a decimal point, which of course is no comfort at all ;)
Jeez. It's mental the length these logic defiers will go in order to defend EA.
It's not "defending EA" to point out that software works differently from a physical wheel.
I agree it's not on, but you have the problem backwards. A real wheel stopping there should give you the building, but in this situation, the wheel is just a visual representation of code. It's not correct to show the wheel stopping on the wrong won item, but that doesn't change which item "should" have been won.
Regardless of which is the cause, it does suck, and it shouldn't be happening.conalmcainsh wrote:
its not a mountain its a tall skyscrapper almost as tall as king homer one
Although this has happened to me more than once, I'm more concerned that he is calling Claus co. a rocky mountain!lyle_catcliffe wrote:
Arlandria606 wrote:
lyle_catcliffe wrote:
beeblebrox900 wrote:
While it is a bit sucky, of course the position of the pointer is not the determining factor as to what you win (like it would be on a real wheel) its merely a graphical representation of a random number generator. You probably lost out by a decimal point, which of course is no comfort at all ;)
Jeez. It's mental the length these logic defiers will go in order to defend EA.
It's not "defending EA" to point out that software works differently from a physical wheel.
I agree it's not on, but you have the problem backwards. A real wheel stopping there should give you the building, but in this situation, the wheel is just a visual representation of code. It's not correct to show the wheel stopping on the wrong won item, but that doesn't change which item "should" have been won.
Regardless of which is the cause, it does suck, and it shouldn't be happening.
What? You're still wrong. You've just explicitly agreed with me. So yes, it *IS* EA's fault that the graphic doesn't match the result- it's lazy programming and op *should* have won Claus Co. as represented in the image. Jeeeeeeezus Chrust.
Please explain to me exactly how a bunch of pixels, rather than the code, dictate what a piece of software does.
Please also explain how someone is "still" wrong when making their first comment on a particular topic.
