Battlefield 3 Activation Error
When i wan't to join to a server via Battlelog, i got this message, i tried everything, deleting Logs,restart pc,uninstalling the game,uninstalling the EA App, tried with VU client, but the same problem... i played this game 10+ years ago with my old pc there was no problem with it..
STEAMDECK support
I know when I first had the steamdeck, I was able to play all Battlefield games, but suddenly they pulled the plug and support for Battlefield in the steamdeck. I just wanted to play multiplayer anywhere I go again in any Battlefield, heck, it could possibly run Battlefield 6 if they let support reach to it once again!
what if cheats became a handicap instead of an advantage?
Hi everyone, I’ve been thinking about this: let’s assume cheaters will always find a way to bypass traditional anti-cheat detection. If that’s the case, maybe it makes more sense to stop chasing them only on the detection side and instead try to make cheats useless—or even turn them into a handicap. The idea would be to add a layer of deception: Server-side decoys visible only to suspicious clients – for example, NPCs or off-map anchor points that a wallhack would show as real, misleading cheaters into making wrong moves. Random fake targets during events like death, respawn, or loading – for legit players it’s just a transition screen, but for someone with an aimbot it looks like a real target, and the auto-aim might snap to it. Invisible “probe players” with unnatural movements (zig-zag, sharp curves) – a human wouldn’t react, but an aimbot might track them, revealing suspicious behavior. The system wouldn’t have to issue instant bans, but instead could gather evidence over multiple events and apply progressive mitigations. This way, cheats become less reliable, and cheat developers would need to invest more effort and resources just to keep them functional. What do you think? Is this just a silly idea, or could it actually help strengthen existing anti-cheat systems?
My least favorite BF Games, My favorite BF Games:
My least favorite BF Games: 1 BF 2042 themed, weapons, bugs, player count, no cover, maps were too open, maps were too big, no campaign. 2 BF Hardline themed, weapons, Bugs 3 BF 2142 themed, weapons, Bugs 8 BF5 Bugs, weapons were jammed a couple of times. 9 BF4 bugs 10 BF1 Bugs, weapons were jammed a couple of times. 4 BF Heroes lack of gameplay 5 BF2 modern combat two was just ok My favorite BF Games: 1 BF Bad company 1 2 BF Bad company 2 3 BF3 4 BF4 5 BF1 themed 6 BF 1942 7 BF 1943 8 BF5 themed 9 BF2
🇲🇽📡 Request: Mexico Hosted Battlefield Servers for LATAM
To EA/DICE and fellow Battlefield players in Latin America, We are calling on EA/DICE to add official Battlefield servers in Mexico to serve players across Mexico and the LATAM North region (including Central America and U.S. border states). Right now, players in this region are forced to connect to distant servers such as San Jose, Dallas, Miami, or Brazil. The extra distance and routing reduce match responsiveness and consistency an issue other major titles have already solved by adding servers in Mexico. Why this matters: Higher latency impacts hit registration, reaction speed, and overall match quality. Many players leave matches or disengage from the game entirely due to avoidable connection issues. Players in Mexico should enjoy the same low‑latency experience that their neighbors across the border already have. Why Mexico is the right location: A server cluster in Mexico City would improve network performance for LATAM North players. It would relieve pressure on San Jose, Dallas, and Brazil servers, benefiting all regions. Other competitive titles (Valorant, LoL, CS2, PUBG Mobile) have added Mexico‑based servers and grown their player counts as a result. How you can help: Reply with your city/state and platform. Share screenshots of your in‑game network graph or Origin/Steam overlay. Post this thread on social media with #BattlefieldMex and tag EA/DICE community managers. Let’s make this the central hub for LATAM North players to be heard. With enough voices and evidence here, this request will be impossible to ignore. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Para EA/DICE y jugadores de Battlefield en América Latina: Solicitamos a EA/DICE que agregue servidores oficiales de Battlefield en México para dar servicio a jugadores de México y la región de LATAM Norte (incluyendo Centroamérica y estados fronterizos de EE. UU.). Actualmente, los jugadores de esta región deben conectarse a servidores lejanos como San José, Dallas, Miami o Brasil. La distancia adicional y el enrutamiento afectan la respuesta y consistencia en las partidas un problema que otros títulos importantes ya han resuelto añadiendo servidores en México. Por qué esto importa: Una latencia más alta afecta el registro de disparos, la velocidad de reacción y la calidad general de las partidas. Muchos jugadores abandonan o dejan de participar por problemas de conexión que podrían evitarse. Los jugadores en México deberían disfrutar de la misma experiencia de baja latencia que tienen sus vecinos al otro lado de la frontera. Por qué México es la ubicación adecuada: Un clúster de servidores en Ciudad de México mejoraría el rendimiento de red para la región de LATAM Norte. Aliviaría la carga en los servidores de San José, Dallas y Brasil, beneficiando a todas las regiones. Otros juegos competitivos (Valorant, LoL, CS2, PUBG Mobile) ya cuentan con servidores en México y han visto crecer su base de jugadores. Cómo puedes ayudar: Responde con tu ciudad/estado y plataforma. Comparte capturas de tu gráfico de red en el juego o de la superposición de Origin/Steam. Difunde este hilo en redes sociales con #BattlefieldMex y etiqueta a los community managers de EA/DICE. Hagamos de este el punto central para que los jugadores de LATAM Norte sean escuchados. Con suficientes voces y evidencia aquí, será imposible ignorar esta solicitud.Could be new Battlefield?
Am I the only one who is hoping/wanting the next battlefield game will be Vietnam themed, they’ve only ever made 1 Vietnam war themed battlefield all the way back in 2004 and they could do so much with it. I don’t know am I crazy or what? Most fps shooters or realistic type shooters rarely ever tap into the Vietnam war zone even though there is so much you can do with it and the maps can be so incredible. I feel like if they made another Vietnam war battlefield it could be so big.Time to say Good By
I've been playing Battlefield since BF2 / BC 2 and have around 3k to 4k hours in the BF franchise. The last BF that was still Battlefield is BF4 and I've been waiting for a new Battlefield ever since. BF1 started with the gimik CoD garbage, and I was hoping BF2042 was the low point we had to reach to get a real Battlefield again. But EA/Dice are probably more like “If you do insane **bleep**, always double down on it” BF6 is braindead run and gun CoD trash, with Battlefield sprinkles on top. No teamplay, no tactical elements just brain dead run and gun. Really sad. I have just made a refund and will no longer hope for a Battlefield. There are too many CoD and clones and they are all garbage. I'll always remember the experiences I've had over the years, but there hasn't been a Battlefield since BF4 and BF1 to BF6 is proof that EA has no interest in producing another spin-off. Rest in Peace, my Friend!
CONSOLES / MOUSE AND KEYBOARD SUPPORT for New battlefield 2025
Hello! Here I am referring to the discussion about mouse and keyboard support on consoles for the new battlefield that is currently in the works. With great hope and fear that this time EA and DICE will do whatever it takes to get support on consoles because over 10,000 players signed a petition for 2042 and NOTHING HAPPENED. With the CROSS PLAY option, every game deserves to have this support. What is your opinion on this? I personally have my doubts about it. Can DICE or EA tell us anything about this?
