Forum Widgets
Recent Discussions
Weekly weapons Scrap Exchange updates
I have calculated the theoretical amout of scraps you would need if every item would appear in the weekly exchange and you could buy it that way. Amount of scraps needed by category and total: 10.000 x 17 = 170.000 2.000 x 195 = 390.000 800 x 262 = 209.600 300 x 372 = 111.600 TOTAL x 846 = 881.200 Puzzles are NOT taken into account here! Meaning the number would be higher still. But since you tend to get all pieces over time with the OP Battlepacks I excluded them from here. At least without the special rare melee weapons which are otherwise unobtainable like the Ararebo, Coupe Coupe, Arditi Dagger(still unobtainable, has never been seen in the exchange) and Barbed Wire Bat If we assume the average loot per day looks like this we roughly get 1k scraps every day 30+90+270 & 90+270+270 = 1020/day Now that we have the total amount of scraps needed and a rough estimate on the average loot based on personal experience from over 1 year of daily grinding we can calculate how many days of grinding we need to earn the necessary scraps to be able to buy every skin in the game which looks like this: 881.200/1020 = 863.922 days This accumulates to this timeframe of DAILY grinding needed to earn every skin in the game: 2 years 4 months ~2 weeks (11 days) Again, this is assuming all skins where available in the exchange which is far from the case making the situation even worse. This timeframe is unacceptable for a AAA game you paid over 100€ for at release, me included. Some free2play games involve less grinding than this just to earn some textures. I understand that there was monetary incentive behind making the game intentionally grindy (though I still find this practice to be in a AAA game unacceptable by principle) to boost Battlepack sales. But this game is almost 8 years old now and I really doubt you're making anywhere close to the amount of money compared to the release period. Meaning there is no more incentive to make this game intentionally grindy anymore. My suggestion would be to either remove the daily limit of Operation Battlepacks, increase the limit from 2 to something like 4 or 5 per day or have them drop 2 or 3 crates instead of 1 at a time. Unlike currently this is much more respectful of the players time. Money is one thing but to disrespect the players time to this extent when we know that everyones time is limited both in daily terms and total just so you get some textures is ridiculous. Due to the age of the game please reconsider the current way of earning scraps to make it more tolerable. I've come too far to give up now but most people don't have this patience. Me included (for future or other games) since this will be the last game I'll grind this much for. If the next Battlefield turns out to be this grindy I'll really think twice before buying something which doesn't respect anyones time. Thanks in advance, hope to see some changes to this system!
"Fall of Empires" codex entry is bugged for me. What to do?
Hello, as the title says, i can't get this codex entry. It says I need to complete the campaign, which i've already done 12x times [Screen1], but still it's locked for me [Screen2]. I've tried playing on community servers, official servers without special rules, won and lost on all 4 maps but abolutely nothing seems to work. Had no problem getting the previous campaigns codexes, so i really dont know what causes it to not work this time. Is there something I can do?
Is BF4 can’t be play by laptop with 5090？
I have just gotten my new laptop with 5090 two weeks ago.But today I download bf4 back,it told me that there is something wrong with my DX.But I checked DX and my driver only found that there were all ok.I tried a lot of way to solve it but none of them worked.Anybody knows some useful ways?
Bf1 Unplayable?
Im not super familiar with the franchise, i downloaded the game because i used to play on xbox but i cant connect to any games. This isnt an issue in any other game i have, even other ea titles. Any help? I have tried messing with the firewall, network settings, new cable, all sorts of things
Please bring back Battlefield 1943
It's been almost 2 years since the servers were taken offline and there has been no game like it since. Drop in/drop out with rock, paper, siccors weapon mechanics, no level up advantages, and arcade style gameplay. All EA would have to do is upgrade the textures and they could sell it for $40. Heck if EA really wanted to milk this is could just port the 3 original maps and release it as free to play but then sell DLC for more maps and game modes (though if done incorrectly it could hurt the game). I still have the game saved on my ps3, 360, and Series X in hopes that the servers might get turned back on someday. Even the r/battlefield1943 sub reddit is still active.
Rogue-like Destruction: Every Battlefield Match Feels Truly Unique
Hey soldiers, Battlefield has never just been about shooting — it’s about feeling war on a grand scale. Remember the skyscraper collapsing in BF4? Or that RPG hitting the bridge on Seine Crossing? Destruction wasn’t just pretty. It was proof something big happened there. Now, with Battlefield Labs and future titles, destruction is back — but often just for visuals. I want to propose something different: Destruction as gameplay. Destruction as story. Destruction as a rogue-like system. What’s the idea? Each match randomly selects a set of destructible sectors. These are designed beforehand, but only some are active per round. So in one match, you can destroy a building to create a flanking path. In another, that building stands solid — and you need to adapt. This gives variety, unpredictability, and player-driven chaos. You’re not just playing the same map again. You’re fighting through something new. How it evolves: At the start, destruction is limited. As the match progresses, more destructible sectors become active. By the endgame, players unlock the potential to reshape the battlefield in dramatic ways. This pacing avoids early-match spam and builds tension. It rewards teams that survive long enough to "earn the ruin." The world reacts: Environmental events like storms, earthquakes, artillery, and more could influence destruction too. Not just visual effects — real impact. A tornado might collapse buildings. Floods might block routes. Earthquakes might open up new flanking tunnels. Maps don’t just react to players — they react to war itself. Examples by biome: Urban: alleys or buildings open or close based on match layout. Desert: sandstorms reduce visibility, collapse structures. Forest: fires spread, floods redirect players. Snow: ice cracks, avalanches cut off areas. Why this makes sense: Players get new tactical situations without needing dozens of new maps. Devs reuse assets in smarter, procedurally randomized ways. It combines what worked in BF4 (Levolution), BF2042 (weather), and classic destruction — but with purpose. Bottom line: Destruction should tell the story of what players did. Not just look cool. Every wall blown up. Every rooftop shattered. Every corner turned into rubble — it should all say: “You survived this war. You changed the battlefield.” That’s Battlefield at its best. Let’s make destruction matter again.
Upcoming Battlefield...
Dear Dice... As a long time fan, I beg for the upcoming Battlefield to feel gritty, cinematic and enjoyable. We should NOT be able to change our soldier's looks. They are a soldier, not a barbie doll... customization should only be conducted in tasteful weapon and vehicle skins (Mind you, I say tasteful) Shouldn't the point be to make money off of the millions of copies sold, rather than release $25.99 skins tacked on as "content"? I much rather the battlepack system, as it felt rewarding to get a cool skin for a gun you like or a puzzle piece for a melee weapon, rather than just buying it for an absurd price. There is a reason why BF1 is still one of the most played and beloved Battlefield games to date, it avoided all of the scummy modern day gaming practices. 95% of the elements about that game were accurate, and when they were not accurate, at least it was 10x more plausible than whatever BFV was... The players want to have fun in an immersive cinematic experience filled with destruction. We want squad support, detailed environments, polished graphics... and a class system! Why should I have to guess if my teammate has ammo, or health, or anti-vehicle/infantry items... I should be able to see their icon and shout to them "I need ammo/health (etc)!" not just pray they have it... the game should feel realistic and grounded, but not at the cost of fun. I feel like Battlefield V was a turning point, where the direction felt... off... it felt like a random studio tried to make a Battlefield game, rather than an actual product of Dice and EA. Don't even get me started on Firestorm... I hope someone there at Dice stumbles upon an ex-Devs formula sheet for Battlefield 1 in a random drawer somewhere, that includes the magic elements they used to make an incredible game... so everyone can refer to it while production continues into the next installment. From a business perspective, BF1 sold 15 million copies... BFV at 7 million... and 2042 at just only 4 million... if I were the one calling the shots, I'd do whatever to get back that same feel because that's a substantial loss... While I'm sure most fans don't have high expectations, I'm still hopeful. But I think I can speak for most players that this will be our last straw if it does not deliver.
Featured Places
Battlefield
Check out the EA Forums community for the Battlefield franchise.Battlefield Game Info Hub
Read the latest news and announcements from the Battlefield Team.Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.Battlefield 2042 Technical Issues & Bugs
Having issues with Battlefield 2042? Join here to report bugs, and find help with, crashes, connectivity and more.Battlefield V
Join the Battlefield V community to learn all you need to know. Find game information and updates, talk tactics and share Battlefield moments.Battlefield Franchise Discussion
Discuss the Battlefield games in this community forum.
