@johnmiceter
It is not about pinging. It is easy, sure, So is using a mic. The issue is the difference of play-styles, and not the minor details involveD in the game such as pinging. , but when looting takes up too long then it is a disadvantage.
Look, casual or competitive, if you play along with your group you have a better experience. The problem starts when there is a wide disparity, say a level 500 with 5K hours in, who plays along with a level 10 and 4 hours in.
You may argue that 5k hours would make a person a pro, but it is not necessarily so. However, there are going to be noticeable differences.
Besides, at a certain level, blue armor vs purple makes a lot of difference, for example. In general it is easier to gear up from kills than looting the entire map.
@VdstrkWell the majority of my team mates are duos and stay together no matter what and I swear its like the first time they have played the game, but they are level 50-100, but still have no idea how to play.
I like going into fights, but not when my team mates just go in crazily with no tactics at all and die instantly and leave me 1v3 a enemy team. And if by some miracle I kill them all, my team mates constantly pinging and im trying to heal and loot before the next team comes in.
Let's make it clear, im not that good (only a 1.5kd player) and I try and play to suit my team mates which are mostly lucky to get 200 damage. So they nearly always run in with no plan, just crazy run in and die 90/100 times probably.
@johnmiceter
There isn't a correct and a wrong way to play. There are situations, and play-styles. Each play-style handles the same situation differently. A more aggressive (Apex is a fast paced shooter where movement is highly central to its mechanics, independent from tactics but which has an impact on tactics, IMO it rewards an aggressive, movement based play-style) player will push given the opportunity, while a more passive player, more casual, will just prefer to camp a building and wait to be pushed. When you have no comms and one aggressive player and 2 passive, or one passive and 2 aggressive at both extremes of the spectrum, that is when teams are mostly doomed --unless a person in the team is a pro level player, and even then it gets challenging.
I know what you mean. Aggressive and reckless are 2 different things. Lots of people think that dropping hot, and Rambo their way through 6 teams is the way to go, and will help them improve.
I disagree with that tactic, in fact i think it is not a tactic at all. And it does not really help improving.
The passive I refer to, is the kinda passive that, as you said, has no idea what they are doing despite being already level 50 or more, and lags behind by A LOT. Like they seem unable to make up their mind about what guns they wanna use, ans just sit in front of a bin for a while before moving on. You get the picture, i'm sure.
And also beginners are perfectly fine, nothing wrong with being a beginner. I see the difference in "play-style" as the major issue.
I would like it to be a minimum of level 100 before getting in the with the "general" population, but it is unlikely to happen.
