Forum Discussion

Re: 64 Players Conquest Removed AGAIN?!

I thought this stupidity of adding/removing game modes was confined to COD .. but oh no, here DICE go again and mess what little up is left of 2042.

After leaving 2042 unplayed for 1 year after purchase because it was basically rubbish, a good friend and I recently tried 2042 again .. you know, just to see if it was worth playing.  Expecting nothing.

To our surprise, the Exodus Conquest (64 Players) was actually quite good fun.  I mean, yes, all the other modes were still awful cluster flumps .. but that one mode on the classic decent maps (Caspian Border, Arica Harbor & Valparaiso), 64 players, even with the god awful 2042 specialists in .. was playable.

🙂

So come 10th Jan, we've actually finally been enjoying the game we paid for, DICE decide to remove the only reason for playing 2042.

No 64 player Conquest option ..

Way to go.

😠

(And before anyone says ".. just use Portal!", don't .. you will show just how little you know about failings with Portal and how that is NOT any possible type of solution to this issue)

128 players is an awful spammy game mode, all true BF players who have been in since 1942 know it is.

So now 2042 is back on the junk pile.  It is almost like EA/DICE you don't actually play Battlefield? (joke, we know you don't, just having fun).

No RepliesBe the first to reply

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,228 PostsLatest Activity: 20 days ago