Re: Battlefield Core Feedback - Maps - Feedback Thread

I agree but the bags in manifest are too prolific and the seagulls in every applicable map are just poorly done.  Have some fauna is a nice touch but I doubt they'd be present during a battle and especially not all flying in a circle.

---

@LOSSSY wrote:
@Straatford87 Big fan! 👏 On a surface level, the 2042 maps lack depth and detail. Rubbish, litter, signs of battle...recruitment posters, debris, barracks, sandbags etc. I know each round is supposed to represent the beginning of the conflict itself, but maybe with each Live Service season, the maps could become more and more "war torn"? I'd like to share more feedback soon, but wanted to applaud the openness today and look forward to the future recovery improvements 😎👍

---

@LOSSSY @Straatford87 I agree and if they went back to BF3 levels of realism and grime on the maps it would be awesome as BF4/2042s maps are "too clean" and IMO BF1/V were just cluttered messes making enemy identification - especially with the horrible ping system difficult.

I think the "living world" as Guild Wars 2 calls it would be a perfect fit for a live service.  For example the capitl city was completely destroyed in one story arc and for the next year it was slowly rebuild into a new city.  Seeing the maps slowly evolve over time would be an interesting thing to experience.  Of course the converse if what if I like the original version better? Would specific time period evolutions of those maps be available in portal?