Forum Discussion
6 Replies
- kregora3 years agoSeasoned Ace@ennomo96 Metro/Locker and the like only start to make sense when you add "friendly fire" to it. And when you disallow most explosives because of the danger to the own troops.
But that would be putting reason in game design, and we can't have that for Battlefield 2042, can we? That would ruin all the illogical mayhem. - @kregora and thats the reason, why they wait for this map. and this is good. i think it has also to do with the performance. the map has to be a 64 player map. i can tell you, we dont get a very good balance on this map. but with this map dice get a good feedback for granates or explosive stuff. believe me, the map is coming.
- kregora3 years agoSeasoned Ace@ennomo96 So far they struggle extremely with anything destructible, with walls that don't protect from explosions, with gadgets that contradict themselves in design an mechanics. So I doubt they can pull of a metro experience in this type of game.
- @kregora we have irish, we have dozer, we have falk. they can do with a aow server browser or portal server browser. we can set the rules perfectly and the community love it. take a look to bf 3 and 4..
- GrizzGolf3 years agoSeasoned Ace
The only map we haven't gotten that I want SOOOOO bad
- sgtPoulton3 years agoNew Veteran
Metro-locker was never good, brainless meatgrinder to unlock weapon upgrades fast, only COD players may like this kind of maps
also, BF3 and BF4 had SERVER BROWSER and bunch of another brilliant maps
also you have that terrbile shipwreck map from S2 which is similar to metro
Just no
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,234 PostsLatest Activity: 47 minutes ago
Recent Discussions
- 47 minutes ago
- 10 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago