@AOD_CapStar362 Again, never singled out 128 players as a preference, so I'm not sure why everybody is taking that angle. And yeah, I do get the crap end of the stick, which is why I don't like it. It runs through Valparaiso, Arica and Exposure for me, all the time. Valparaiso wasn't adjusted for jet aircraft either, so if you end using them, you can barely get away from any AA lock.
@Moab23 wrote:@AOD_CapStar362 Again, never singled out 128 players as a preference, so I'm not sure why everybody is taking that angle. And yeah, I do get the crap end of the stick, which is why I don't like it. It runs through Valparaiso, Arica and Exposure for me, all the time. Valparaiso wasn't adjusted for jet aircraft either, so if you end using them, you can barely get away from any AA lock.
You have below radar. Adapt and overcome.
Your take that exodus is a problem to be offered as an option is pretty self entitled. You want a mode that many people enjoy to be taken away so they will be FORCED to play the maps you like. The level of selfishness in that view is astounding.
@AOD_CapStar362 Yet again, never mentioned I preferred 128 over 64. Dunno where that's coming from, frankly. Player counter is not an issue for me, its the map rotation favouring older maps for a more limited BF game that at the time lacked features of the full games.
@AOD_CapStar362 Okay, but people keep saying I only want a 128 player mode, which I never said. Its not the player count, its the map rotation I'm bothered about.
@ForumUser wrote:
@AOD_CapStar362
We can only hope (for those religiously inclined maybe even pray) that they don't remove the Exodus playlist again today.
Please, Dice, KEEP EXODUS as a permanent playlist for us to be able to enjoy the good maps as well.
Its gone again isnt it...
@Moab23 wrote:@AOD_CapStar362 Okay, but people keep saying I only want a 128 player mode, which I never said. Its not the player count, its the map rotation I'm bothered about.
other people are bothered when exodus is taken away. why is your opinion and map preferance more important than those who like the old maps?
@Psubond How long has Exodus been in the rotation compared to all other rotations? On that note, why are the preferences of others more important than mine then? They're old maps. We've got new maps, most of which have been changed up for the better, and we barely get to see the majority. That people clamoured about there not being enough new maps but wanting to only play a handful of old ones speaks volumes of how fickle the player base is.
@Moab23 wrote:@Psubond How long has Exodus been in the rotation compared to all other rotations? On that note, why are the preferences of others more important than mine then? They're old maps. We've got new maps, most of which have been changed up for the better, and we barely get to see the majority. That people clamoured about there not being enough new maps but wanting to only play a handful of old ones speaks volumes of how fickle the player base is.
well, when vanilla AOW was up and exodus was up and people had a choice they picked the one they liked. you got mad because they didn't want to play the maps you wanted to play.
i think all options should be available at all times and people should play what they like. i think advocating to REMOVE the option for any of the modes just so you can funnel people into a certain map pack is wrong.
Exodus back in the main rotation and as always, nothing else is being played. In fact, Exodus is barely being played. Monday night, Breakthrough and Conquest were near packed.
@ForumUser I wish they removed it more often. There's far better engagement, and better experience, when Exodus isn't the option. I see more people playing the modes when its out of rotation than when its in. Over the weekend and Monday, you could get a match on conquest or breakthrough no problem. Since Tuesday, with Exodus returning, nothing is playable except Exodus, and there were a lot of bots needed to fill the server.
