Re: Idea to influence the shape of the next Battlefield title.

@Its_Travis_199 Overall I enjoy the game, however it is not exactly what i expected after that awesome trailer 2 years ago. There are things i do enjoy i never thought would be in a BF game too. The silliness of the characters bothered me a bit but not a major issue. I think whatever they had before they brought back classes was great. Huge maps and call in crates all kinds of weapons mixed was great with the huge maps. I really enjoyed for example taking the flag on top of the skyscraper on Hourglass (RIP) and then parachute to the stadium (RIP) with a friend while talking. He was Angel, called in a crate, we switched to sniper config if needed, or loaded a recoilless if tanks were around. All that worked together. The original idea was new and some new things worked, some didn’t (Looking at you CROSSPLAY with all the problems) I feel most people don’t want to get surprises anymore in the next BF game. They want what we had in the past, combine all the good stuff that people liked. Simple. Have premium instead of live service. We need a game that has the traditional values and we really need more content. Not cosmetics and game modes. Maps are king. A lot of them. People are willing to pay for them i bet. I am, for sure.
So for the next game:
-No crossplay
- Probably 64 players enough
- More serious tone with factions
- Get the gunplay and soldier movement right. (No desync and lag etc.)

We need this to be the next BF game. If they want to experiment it’s fine. Do it separately. Make a battle royal game on top of this separately. People might like that too. Make 3 different games if needed to make money. Just make sure 1 of those games would be a traditional BF game with no surprises and no totally new inventions that players might hate.