Forum Discussion

Re: Latest maps only 64 players

@borroma31 After playing this since release, the game can’t handle 128 players. Maybe it’s the servers that can’t handle it, but 128 players was both a fun and miserable experience. The connection was just awful, the network compensation is just wrecked at higher player counts. Of course we were all excited for 128, and bought it in part due to an expectation of bigger maps and more players, and got burned as they couldn’t pull it off. From a game play perspective, the smaller maps and smaller pops play so much better. 100% a game & developer issue, but it’s what we got.

4 Replies

  • sk1lld's avatar
    sk1lld
    Legend
    2 years ago

    I think the 45Hz servers struggled with 128 player, that's what I felt anyway. 128 players would have been fun if the maps and servers could have supported them.

  • IIIWhiteWolfIII's avatar
    IIIWhiteWolfIII
    Rising Ace
    2 years ago

    The more people, the more chaos and I love chaos. I hope it's a 128-player map.

    As a sniper, I prefer shooting at different targets rather than shooting at the same players who know my position.

  • GrizzGolf's avatar
    GrizzGolf
    Seasoned Ace
    2 years ago

    I enjoy 128 but the game runs so much better server wise on 64

  • Anobix's avatar
    Anobix
    Seasoned Ace
    2 years ago

    @sk1lld wrote:

    I think the 45Hz servers struggled with 128 player, that's what I felt anyway. 128 players would have been fun if the maps and servers could have supported them.


    I at least hope that the 128 player maps are the reason we have 45Hz servers... I would hope that they wouldn't have made them worse if it was just 64 player like in previous games.

Featured Places