Re: Paik's "wall hack" - a suggestion for a fix

---

@TheFireOfTitan wrote:
@ragnarok013Word.

People are putting too many hopes in Portal.

And this game is not meant for BF players. It is so evident.

Attachments on the fly, vehicles on the fly (Objectives had vehicles in previous game but no no, they will fly out of the sky now), Spiderman, Wall Hack, Terminator deflecting bullets, Wingsuit is cool gotta say but heat seeking grenades what the...I mean yeah.

This is targeted to players who love big map BR type games - Warzone, Apex, etc.

Portal was definitely an afterthought because they somehow realised how the Conquest would make players think.

---

If it's possible to limit gadgets and weapons per class/specialist then I imagine it will be rather popular being able to play 2042 maps and classic maps with 2042 weapons and gadgets under a classical class structure.

---

@Noodlesocks wrote:

---

@TheFireOfTitan wrote:
@ragnarok013Word.

People are putting too many hopes in Portal.

And this game is not meant for BF players. It is so evident.

Attachments on the fly, vehicles on the fly (Objectives had vehicles in previous game but no no, they will fly out of the sky now), Spiderman, Wall Hack, Terminator deflecting bullets, Wingsuit is cool gotta say but heat seeking grenades what the...I mean yeah.

This is targeted to players who love big map BR type games - Warzone, Apex, etc.

Portal was definitely an afterthought because they somehow realised how the Conquest would make players think.

---

If it's possible to limit gadgets and weapons per class/specialist then I imagine it will be rather popular being able to play 2042 maps and classic maps with 2042 weapons and gadgets under a classical class structure.

---

@Noodlesocks that's exactly what my Portal server will be: 2042/BF3/BC2 maps with BF3 classes.

---

@ragnarok013 wrote:

---

@Noodlesocks wrote:

---

@TheFireOfTitan wrote:
@ragnarok013Word.

People are putting too many hopes in Portal.

And this game is not meant for BF players. It is so evident.

Attachments on the fly, vehicles on the fly (Objectives had vehicles in previous game but no no, they will fly out of the sky now), Spiderman, Wall Hack, Terminator deflecting bullets, Wingsuit is cool gotta say but heat seeking grenades what the...I mean yeah.

This is targeted to players who love big map BR type games - Warzone, Apex, etc.

Portal was definitely an afterthought because they somehow realised how the Conquest would make players think.

---

If it's possible to limit gadgets and weapons per class/specialist then I imagine it will be rather popular being able to play 2042 maps and classic maps with 2042 weapons and gadgets under a classical class structure.

---

@Noodlesocksthat's exactly what my Portal server will be: 2042/BF3/BC2 maps with BF3 classes.

---

Would be cool if they allow the 64 player versions of 2042 maps for PC and current gen consoles so we could run a rotation of all the maps without certain maps turning into a 128 player mess.

Rao's Trojan Network and Paik's wallhack are the same thing but with extra steps and not nearly as good which makes me wonder why anyone would choose Rao over Paik.

@TheFireOfTitan 

---

@TheFireOfTitan wrote:
@ragnarok013Word.


This is targeted to players who love big map BR type games - Warzone, Apex, etc.

---

I honestly don't understand this point of view. I play COD Warzone, Apex Legends and some PUBG from time to time.

So far Battlefield 2042 doesn't look fun at all in my eyes compared to those other titles. The only thing that intrigues me is the main weapons DICE haven't shown off. That's honestly all I care for in a first person shooter, weapons I get to use directly, Specialists look super boring.

I personally don't know people that currently play COD: Warzone that like the Specialists idea.