Re: Substantial research showed that 128-player battles just aren't fun to play!

I do not agree.  Player count has no impact on fun.  Twenty four player battles were a frustrating experience on PS3/XB360 when people kill chased, camped and avoided objectives.  Well it is no different in forty, sixty four, and one hundred twenty eight player Battlefield matches now.  

Instead of making player count the point of focus.  DICE should be asking themselves why their squad feature is ignored by most playing the game?  Why most squad leaders loathe the role?  

Also why do these developers believe that teamwork is going to magically happen in matches between individuals going into the game modes with different goals?  I am tired of playing conqest matches where one team seems to just sit at a single objective for the entire match.  This is not something that is happening in All Out War conquest because the player count is high.  This happens because team structure is abysmal.  

Edit:  As I have said before.  Blaming the player count is an easy out where serious issues plaguing this series continue to get pushed to the back unresolved.  

LOL.  I did not realize that this was the same topic from before until now.  I had already ranted in here once.  Sorry.