Forum Discussion
3 Replies
@direct3r wrote:
@EmineNc33if you can name one indie studio that brought out some 128 player multiplayer shooter with current gen graphics, sure, go on...Obviously EA didn't do that either...
We have FPS around 45, if we are lucky.
We have just around 30-50 live human players in the game, if we are lucky.
And the current gen graphic options on 120Hz or 4k are not utilized....
- direct3r4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@CyberDyme
In my matches are 64 humans against 64 humans, if it's AI it's usually marked as one.
Frames are not everything, especially cause it's mostly client side and more can be archieved by better hardware. (sure there's also optimization, but depending on the techniques used it's getiting pretty hardware intensive)
4k / 120Hz is something for the future in my opinion, maybe for some single player games this does work but usually with graphics up to the max there's not really ANY multiplayer shooter out there with more than 100 players on a map that holds >100fps throughout heavy action scenes - Blank_Disk4 years agoNew Traveler
My guess development has not even started like the previous 2 or 3 battlefield games.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 days ago
- 2 days ago