Re: When will AMD FSR be implemented?

Yes, that's true, but RSR is not working on every AMD GPU.

FSR works even on older GPUs like R9 380X (videos above)

NIS is still bugged, and creates performace degradation.
Nvidia image scaling, major hit to performance | guru3D Forums

Most likely Nvidia will not fix this, they are focused to push 4000 series card in every possible way.

Voice of advice. FSR won`t save you by any chance in Multiplayer Games. What you need as previously stated is a beefy CPU over GPU. You might slash some graphics on lower-end GPU, but for most of the engagements/firefights if the CPU fails, then GGs. You run the game on only 16 gigs of ram on W11 then GGs also. 

I have 32 gigs of 6000mhz. R5 7600X. And incredibly bottlenecking RX 6600 8GB. But to my surprise, the game runs totally fine with medium details between 90 and 135 FPS! I feel like BFs are more CPU than GPU bound or the games' graphics and performance scales up nicely in this regard. I would always strongly suggest a decent/recent single-core-performing at least 6 core 12 thread CPU over a beefy GPU in Multiplayer. Things are fine when CPU and GPU are paired to 1:1 in framerate drawing... in my case CPU is idling a little bit at around 35-55% usage and GPU is always 100%.

I don`t care about DLLSs, FSRs, or Raytracing... and I believe You should not care unless You intend to be less competitive. The framerate has to be good without crazy 1% FPS lows, stutter, and without blurry FSR/DLSS graphics. DLSS and FSR are a marketing gimmick in attempts to convince You that You get more with those technologies... but You don`t honestly. Yes, You get more frames but at the cost of image quality also.

That`s my personal opinion and observations, so I am here to agree to disagree.

Upscaling is useful for 4k displays. Which is what most consoles are connected to.

I'm using Nvidia upscaling in Battlefield 1 to get 125fps with my Nvidia 1060 on a 1440p display. The Nvidia upscaler looks way clearer than the game's built-in upscaler.