Forum Discussion
22 Replies
- Anonymous12 years ago
Im having the same problem aswell. i have a Gtx 770 oc and i tried so many "solutions" in the forums and nothing seems to have worked yet. I putt everything to low and it ran around 160fps but then drops randomly down to 30. i had this problem in the beta aswell. thought they would have fixed it by now but i guess not.
- Anonymous12 years ago
Im having the same problem aswell. i have a Gtx 770 oc and i tried so many "solutions" in the forums and nothing seems to have worked yet. I putt everything to low and it ran around 160fps but then drops randomly down to 30. i had this problem in the beta aswell. thought they would have fixed it by now but i guess not.
yep...it won't hold a steady frame rate no matter what. it will jump up into the 70s on low and act like it can run fine...then immeidately it falls off to 25 FPS and is unplayable.
i was going to go out and buy a better nvidia card but it seems like even if i get a 660 there's no guarantee it will work
trust it doesnt matter what card you have ive got a GTX 660 and intel i5 4670k and the game is still uplayable like yours. the game isnt close to being optimised and they shouldnt have released it... im really pi$$ed off but there nothing you can do but wait or get refund. cause EA dont seem to give much of a sh1t now they have there money...
this is also coming from someone who owns all battlefields and premium for both so them not caring isnt right and its just crappy service.
So much rage for a game thats been out 2 days i am sure they will fix this as soon as they can i have GTX 680 with i7 with 8g RAM and only get frame lag from time to time running it at max and only have 2-3 sec frame lag. i am useing the GeForce R331 game ready driver version 331.65.
- Anonymous12 years ago
I have a GTX670 and I was nervous that I would have to upgrade, but I run at 2560x1440 on High/Ultra at 60+ fps.
an ea apologist appears :rolleyes:
i paid for the game...i have hardware well above the "minimum specs"...why won't it run? because AMD coughed up more cash than nvidia? that's a legitimate reason to be upset. i can see what the game looks like...it's nothing amazing and is hardly even a huge step up from BF3, there's no reason for this just like there was no reason for the 100% CPU usage issue in beta that made my fx6100 unable to function.
- Anonymous12 years ago
I beg to differ. If you've played many of the BF4 maps in Ultra x2 / x4 AA, it's quite a show. There are additional effects to be found that just aren't there in BF3. Some of the differences are subtle, others are more demanding and really impressive.
That aside, I'm crashing as well on an ATI graphics card, requiring either a hard reboot, or a 'BF4 has stopped working' error. So neither Nvidia or AMD are trouble free in this case.
- Anonymous12 years ago
I really don't Know, DICE should be honest and tell us whats going on. I just bought BF4 and after running the Graphics test it said the quality of my system was bad and set everything to either low or off, and it still runs like crap. now apart from the fact that Iam running a 32 bit system, I have a i7 4770, a Sniper 5m M/B, 2 GTX 670s and the latest Nvidia Drivers. Surely dispite the fact of the 32bit, it should run better than it does. The stutter that I experience is the same symptom the I have only recently come accross on BF3. I suspect DICE have done something with the netcode. I sure hope they do something to fix this problem because BF3 is the best game out at the moment, and BF4 looks like it's going to surpass it once these problems are solved.
you say so much rage but when i pay £50 for the deluxe edition and then £40 for premium and cant even play the game im suposed to be ok with that? no i want a refund for not being able to play this game which should easily run on my system...