You're complaining about a brand new game running on Frostbite 3 not running well on an outdated, budget video card?
You don't expect a PS4 game to run flawlessly on a PS3.
I definitely do not have a 'budget card' if you call a GTX 660 a 'budget card' and I don't expect the game to be perfect but playable. This is Homefront all over again just from EA lets hope it doesn't take 2 weeks to fix like that did.
GTX 660
Intel i5 4670k
8g ram
I don't know about you but none of that is budget and runs every other game on Max settings... If it can run crysis 3 no probs then this game isn't any more special and has no excuse its not my rig bud.
"lets hope it doesnt take 2 weeks to fix like that did."
What do you expect? They fix Beta bugs, causing more bugs to arise, that's how development works.
I've got a gtx670 and get 60 fps stable on medium, which already looks great, so I don't complain.
none of that is still an excuse when a game comes out it should be able to be played i cant play it when on any setting it goes from 120 fps to 1-5 fps every 5-10 seconds not even moving and this happens! development stage should be done when the full release comes out i didnt pay for an extended beta. when games come out yes they have issues but none so bad that you cant play. that is all im saying and i still am not happy i spent £90 for a shelf piece and a broken game...
Stop whining like a little girl and give us some info; what OS are you running, 64 or 32-bit, what specific settings; have you tracked your vram usage; have you isolated bottlenecks etc?
Or are you whining without knowing the *real* problem and expect others to figure it out?
My game is running smooth as **bleep** on medium, no FPS drops at all, Windows 8.1 64-bit, vram usage is just over 1.3gb out of 2gb possible.
Now you go.
