What made BF1 so much more anti social? Spotting? Etc
I am genuinely curious about the massive anti social effect of BF1 on PC. It has literally killed some clans who have gone back a decade or more. I think a lot of this is that the owned servers have no identity or meaning as there is little point to active management. But the most noticable difference that manifests in game as far as I see it is that literally, hardly anyone spots. So I tend to focus on that as a very clear differentiation ( I dont have access to the actual data that shows how many BF clans literally disolved because people went off and did other things). So in terms of the obvious lack of spotting. Why would this be? It is free points and makes it hugely more likely that the team that spots mosts wins (if hacks are out of the equation).
It is also free points and makes it more likely that if you did good damage but didnt quite finish off your man you will get the kill.
esting to me at least.
Giving the overpowering reasons to spot. Why do so few people actually do it?
Do spot as a matter of routine? Why?
Do you not see the need or just dont, why?
If you have a long history of BF, I would be interested in your view of BF1. I find it the most anti social of BF. Little engagement, little leadership. Usually a massively random effect where few people truly work together in any meaninful way. Though when it happens, it is magic!.