Forum Discussion
Look fun ^^.
The subject had been discussed on previous battlefield and they stayed 32 vs 32 for a balance problem.
BUT, with the new battleroyal mode that can change, we'll see.
- Carbonic8 years agoHero+
Another reason for 64 players not having changed is that while the server hardware has changed in time, so has Battlefield. A lot more things are being tracked and the tickrate has gone up so these updates gets sent at a quicker interval. I would like to test out a 50vs50 server, see how lower the FPS gets with the extra players and if the servers could keep up without sacrificing hit registration etc.
- 8 years ago
As much as I would love to see DICE raising the player count in matches I just don't see it happening just yet, Battlefield as a series has always been known for its 64 player cap and still having netcode/networking issues, raising that will bring even more instability.
if a WW2 game with 50 vs 50 player count interests you that much, I would highly recommend keeping an eye on Post Scriptum, it's a WW2 game geared more towards realism and simulation like Project Reality and Squad if you heard or played those, it's on steam and you can check the roadmap here
50 vs 50 dedicated servers is something they wish to bring to the table.
- EA_Atic8 years ago
DICE Team
You could "unlock" it by modding Battlefield 2, to do 128 players combat. It was interesting. 🙂
/Atic
About Battlefield V
Recent Discussions
- 9 minutes ago
- 5 hours ago
- 16 hours ago