Why is the player base so poor recently?
Anyone else noticed? It’s the same thing over and over. One awesome team vs a bunch of randoms playing for themselves. The level of awareness is almost bot like - programmed to be stupid or amazing ...
Forum Discussion
@NuttysKunKsThe playerbase has always been poor.
Perhaps the game has a lot of new players now (due to discounts etc), but half the time, the games are wildly unbalanced and this is often due to good players on one side vs. "noobs" on the other. Or one side has "20 camping snipers" vs. the other side with all players PTFOing. But it has always been like this.
Even BF4, with almost only vets now, has this problem.
Dice really needs to do something about balance, we will see what happens in BF6, because it has been an issue that has only gotten worse in BF1 and BFV.
Very true.. the only solution that comes to mind are private minimum ranking servers.
If let’s say the minimum level was 75 to play on a server the player base would be much better quality.
Thats the only way I see of implementing some sort of balance.
end of round balance could work but dice seems to stumble at how to make it balanced.
Everyone is just waiting for the cheaters to play enough for a while.
This was the case with battle 4, now there are almost no cheaters there. After a year, you can safely play
Now you just sit and report the cheaters throughout the match, go to another map and the same thing continues there, but with other cheaters.
You just work as a moderator in the game while others are fun for the cheaters.
EA_AticDICE Team
Before we start derailing this thread a friendly reminder talking about cheating it's something we don't allow currently on AHQ.
/Atic
You are wrong, there is a lot of lvl 300+ guys who just sit at spawn with the tank or something, just ******* off to their big KD :D Though I agree that most new players tend to play sniper for some reason.
I'm not sure but I'm thinking the influx of ps+ players might not be such an enjoyable experience for average players like me. Balance seems miles worse (is that possible) and certain situations and modes/maps might be better avoided.
No totally disagree. This would just further divide the community, would reduce server player counts because all those under 75 wouldnt be able to join. More than likely the over 75 servers be even more clan stacked. Wouldnt solve balancing, you need to fix, improve the balancing id have thought based on the results from previous round results.
By including dedicated clan support in game it would remove a lot of clan pub stacking. Without it, Platoons actually promote beating up of randoms in numbers. If they got regularly wooped, ladders, tourneys in game then its more likely the bullies stackers team will self explode or lose players when their team knows its place.
Dice do something about balance? HA, I came back to BFV recently and it's just like it was before with garbage balance.
Yes
Balancing is a bit hit and miss ive played games been outnumber by 10 plus players, even worse when clans have members on the other side and then intentionally sabotage your side.
When schools are over in summer there will be a lot more action on servers unless there's some new toy arriving which holds attention better...
