Hopes for f1 25

---

@IanM282 wrote:

@TheRagebeardWell that rule did not apply to me with my ban whatsoever. Mine was for criticism of the game. Not that I'm bothered, just stating my experience.

---

Same with me. I have never been banned from any forum in my life and never had insulted anyone or criticized anyone. This game is very bad. I paid for it and it is the most inferior purchase I have had. This is what I said. Poor quality. Period

Don't talk about forum moderation.  It's against forum rules.   Also a banning offence

@LightPilgrimSame again, when people are paying £90 for a product that is by far way worse than it's predecessor, then complaints will inevitably occur.

My main complaint is similar to others in the fact that F124 is quite simply the worst game they've ever made, with the least content, least enjoyment, most amount of game breaking bugs and just rushed out with zero testing. Now in my book people should be able to repeatedly and respectfully complain until that becomes resolved without getting a ban.

If they don't want repeating complaints, then improve the product in the first place by beginning with actually listening and implementing what everyone has been asking for.

F124 is a poor product that has fallen way short of the mark and fully deserved all the complaints thus far.

Overall, in F1 24, there was a significant effort to improve car handling as can be seen by the addition of new setup items as well as larger/different ranges for existing items beyond what existed in F1 23. 

This was a step in the right direction, but there needs to be significant additional development of the handling model, given there are more variables to deal with, and as a result a lot more permutations in terms of setups. Working through all those additional interactions has to be the top priority, as this is a driving game. 

If I get a ban from

saying how bad the product is, I might as well get a ban from being able to purchase it. Fair enough. 

@IanM282 @LightPilgrim 

I don't know what you got banned for and I'm not trying to defend them, just advising what normally is considered fair and what is foul so people can avoid future bans.

@ScarDuck14  Don't worry I'm still here.

---

@TheRagebeard wrote:

@IanM282 @LightPilgrim 

I don't know what you got banned for and I'm not trying to defend them, just advising what normally is considered fair and what is foul so people can avoid future bans.

@ScarDuck14  Don't worry I'm still here.

---

I got inspired by this ban. I had time to rethink life and how I see things around me. And while contemplating, I made a discovery and found a way of how I will save 100$ this year:-) I guess it was worth it:-)

---

@Nellix82 wrote:
@dwin20when you have left left right right in the geometry all rigid settings it means that those options are useless do you know why? because it is a purely preset arcade game where from a certain number of turns you have that wear that rhythm etc etc......always because for them the occasional player is already mentioned in the name so someone who will not always play but buys the game is more important than someone who wants to complete the game to the end

---

@Nellix82  the left left right right is one of the frustrating parts of the game. Every time you go to do a customized setup and enter that you realize that the game does not address serious F1 fans. I wish F1 management would rethink this.