PLOT | Next game, what will that be?
Just to see what you people are expecting in a next game, if one is ever done.
I think MEA is a sort of a stand alone project. Making grounds (probably making experiments as it goes) and room for ...
Forum Discussion
@CasperTheLich wrote:
from the transmissions you hear at one of those kett bases, it seems like archon is an actual title or position in the kett ranks. like legate or praetorian (if you're into ancient rome).
Also likely to be more just like him around, well maybe not just like him as he went off the Kett books so to speak. But others working under Kett rule.
Maybe even others higher up then an Archin before even looking to get near the big wig dude.
A lot seem to think the Jardaan will be an enemy - I don't see it. All evidence points at them being pro-life, not anti-life. There may have been a faction of them against the main. I also think they are gone, like the protheans and we will end up having to deal with whatever it was that vanished them. Evidence being them making a point of Liara mentioning how to determine if a race is extinct or not. I think we will be making this determination in time for the Jardaan.
Nykara360 wrote:A lot seem to think the Jardaan will be an enemy - I don't see it. All evidence points at them being pro-life, not anti-life.
Just a note, where I'm from there are quite a few people who are pro-life, and plenty of others are willing to think of them as an enemy, so that doesn't necessarily mean anything one way or another.
Plus genetic uplift, genetic purification/super[race] making, and involuntary genetic "improvement" (real or imagined), doesn't always make friends
Just complementing my first post, I also would not like the protagonist to change every game, unless it completely made sense (besides the ever odd feeling of a protagonist going 3 games in a row, yet always forgetting what he/she had learned in the previous games, having to get xp and skills all over again 😕).
My hunch of a timeline 10 years ahead would give time for the siblings to ... Alecfy. I mean, get mature, firm and more optimized with SAM. It also helps evolving some personal issues among your squad mates, perhaps making Liam die due a severe case of angara syphilis.
@PandaTar wrote:Just complementing my first post, I also would not like the protagonist to change every game, unless it completely made sense (besides the ever odd feeling of a protagonist going 3 games in a row, yet always forgetting what he/she had learned in the previous games, having to get xp and skills all over again 😕).
My hunch of a timeline 10 years ahead would give time for the siblings to ... Alecfy. I mean, get mature, firm and more optimized with SAM. It also helps evolving some personal issues among your squad mates, perhaps making Liam die due a severe case of angara syphilis.
Wouldn't Liam need to get a date first?
One of the reasons why I think the next ME game will not be about the Ryders is because Ryder is a Pathfinder and why open up the Heleus cluster as our new surroundings to leave it again?
The Kett arc if there will be on will be more of a military mission than a discovery mission. The only way that Ryder, in my view, could be a logical continuation is if she/he stops being a Pathfinder, in which case it'd have to be a pretty clear reason after the heroics in the heleus cluster.
So not saying it's impossible but I just wonder how it makes sense to still be pathfinding in part 2 in the same Heleus cluster. Fighting over more planets in a different area with the Kett again as part of getting closer to the Kett Empire seems a bit thin as well and would have a rather been-there, done-that feel.
