Forum Discussion
@EA_Aljo wrote:
@kyl_35 wrote:
@EA_Aljo wrote:As far as being more transparent goes, I tried that with the True Broadcast camera thread. It wasn't as well received as I hoped. Normally, our transparency just results in more toxic responses. Which doesn't give us motivation to be more transparent.
I firmly disagree with you saying the responses you received in that thread were “toxic”. You received a lot of appreciation from people for the clarity while they were also expressing the frustration behind the decision.
Any of the posts you don’t like in that thread would have been as bad or worse had you said nothing.
The appreciation was great. That doesn't go unnoticed, but you're also not seeing the posts that had to be removed. While we know some people appreciate the transparency, it tends to invite a lot of rude responses. We expect to get them, but hoped for better in this case. Especially with the requests to be more transparent, which we did, but it didn't go over as well as we hoped. I'm not saying we'll never do that again, but as far as an experiment goes, it was met with mixed results.
@Beauts90 I believe you had a post that was part of a thread that was removed.
I can see where you’re coming from, but consider what it looks like…
Every time we’re transparent about the reason for something people get really mad at the reason and poke holes in the logic. So we’re just not going to provide reasons anymore.
Deleted posts aside, it looks crazy sketchy to make game impacting moves and then not provide any clarity. It makes people even more skeptical about things we’re not told about; and it’s a big reason EA has lost the benefit of the doubt with most people on this board.
And just to get the thread back on track…
I still haven’t bought the game and likely
won’t until a couple of things are fixed. One of those being Full Presentation coming back. Even then, one thing is certain…
- kyl_353 years agoSeasoned Ace
@kyl_35 wrote:And just to get the thread back on track…
I still haven’t bought the game and likely
won’t until a couple of things are fixed. One of those being Full Presentation coming back. Even then, one thing is certain…
Update: I bought the game today because I found it on Facebook marketplace for $30
- 3 years ago@kyl_35 I am sorry for your loss
- 3 years ago
@kyl_35But really, that’s all it’s worth now lol. I see it’s been dropped at Walmart, for 48 bucks Canadian. That’s insanely low for a brand new release. It’s not even a deal price. That’s just it’s normal price instead of 79.99
even then, I honestly wouldn’t even drop 20 bucks for it. It’s not worth it at all, in my opinion anyways
- CLX903 years agoSeasoned Hotshot
@EA_Aljo here is little tip for the future NHL games... You don't need and shouldn't remove ANYTHING that players has an choise to choose wich one to use... Full presentation or condensed... And also what comes to true broadcast camera... Why did that have to replace with something that really isn't TRUE broadcast? Why just not make new camera angle and keep that TRUE broadcast and name that new camera angle to something else...
People like when they have choises wich one to use... And because you did remove stuff what we had choises last year... Some of these wanted refund and some of those hasn't even bought the game and these people aren't coming back before you give these choises back... And like me and many others are really hoping these two things are both coming back... I know that i would buy the game IF these two things are coming back. So what i want for Christmas is FULL PRESENTATION and the ORIGINAL TRUE BROADCAST CAMERA.
About NHL 23
Recent Discussions
Muž
Solved18 days ago- 21 days ago