Should moderators have to meet certain criteria as players in WOC?

Happy to play sometime. Let me know if you want to run some games.

E_AISCOPING wrote:

How else can they be trusted to have an educated conversation on the product? 

Send a PM, let's play.

I’m not trying to be rude with this reply but what amount of knowledge is the required amount. We have a mod who is vocal about playing the game that also replies to these comments. I feel lucky about that. 

what would your mod requirements be out of curiosity? Not trying to be a **bleep** and I know I’m coming off that way but I’m truly curious as to what would be enough. Hours played kinda thing? High rating in HUT? What’s the criteria your looking for?

GT?

Let me know when you want to play and we'll schedule something. I can probably get a couple other mods here to join as well.

Good WOC stats, specifically +/-.  HUT is a pay to win casino, and also doesn’t show that you know hockey as you’re controlling the entire team and not working with other hockey players, but EA’s heavily flawed computers that you take control of as soon as the puck touches their blade anyways. 

I’d argue a +/- of half of your games played is solid enough that I trust your opinion of the product. 

Ideally, you want good players managing this. Good IMO is a +/- above your GP.

GT?

GT  🤷🏻‍♂️