Proof of Hidden Springfield Heights Land!!!!

If someone has extra land unlocked they are probably a hacker. You really don't want to go that route.

I agree, it appears you may not have the land from the second phase of the heights. Also suggest its not on to be posting the username of another town in the pic. See the post by EllieGuseman above for more info.

"Willy9292;c-1981948" wrote:
I agree, it appears you may not have the land from the second phase of the heights. Also suggest its not on to be posting the username of another town in the pic. See the post by EllieGuseman above for more info.

Exactly. It’s considered bad form to be posting images of SFs that are not your own without permission — especially when you’re including the username.

Have you done both releases of the heights. Do you have the advertising agency, as there were 3 rows released with it. Again, its not very polite to be identifying the other user the way you are. There is no hidden land. Either you have not done both releases, or the other user is using unapproved methods to get it. If it is the latter read the rules thread on what is not to be discussed here.

Erm... yup :|

"casfan7;c-1981952" wrote:
I do have all the land from the second phase. See if you can friend brokegrannie and see for yourselves :)

You’re publicly accusing a specific user of cheating. In your eagerness to impart what you think is somehow vital information, you’re violating a bunch of this forum’s norms.

I feel sorry for broke grannie ... she's obviously penny less :/

None of my posts make any reference to any user cheating. I am suggesting there is extra land in Springfield Heights as one can see. As far as using a username I am guilty of stupidity and did not think through my actions. I am truly sorry for any wrong doing on my part.

I will forward your "proof" to area 51 :D

"0Brooders0;c-1981980" wrote:
I will forward your "proof" to area 51 :D

And you'll never be seen again. :D