DICE Team@nano3570 Agreed with Everything you said.
I have been asking for MORE Maps for ages. This game is so boring due to the lack of different places and looks etc that there is no real difference. And once inside, they all tend to look the same anyway.
I also agree with the Sea side of things too. Oh, and how about being able to parachute from a C130 instead of just a helicopter drop off.
And where are the circling Gunships we used to have. This game hasent gone forwards, it's gone Backwards.
@80uwjx4m1chc wrote:@nano3570 Agreed with Everything you said.
I have been asking for MORE Maps for ages. This game is so boring due to the lack of different places and looks etc that there is no real difference. And once inside, they all tend to look the same anyway.
I also agree with the Sea side of things too. Oh, and how about being able to parachute from a C130 instead of just a helicopter drop off.
And where are the circling Gunships we used to have.
The day 2042 gets an AC-130 and more Portal Maps is the day I change my Steam review from Negative to Positive.
The review will read as:
Recommends Battlefield 2042 because:
Has AC-130.
You're probably wondering why though? It's because if a Battlefield game can have an AC-130, it's because they've fixed everything below it. Having an AC-130 relies on so much being right from Anti-Air, Jets and sound design that you could say, its why only the commander could call it in, in BF4.
Overall though, good update.
I'm seeing far less UI artifacts.
Why not?
It can be done..
After all, there is also A10 Thunderbolt in the current game. Then that too will be a target, according to your logic.
When we say "Gunship", we do not mean a portal or a map where there are air defense missiles everywhere like ants.
For example, they open a different map mode, in that game there is a feature to choose certain expert soldiers(just infantry and APC,(except fighter jets), thus, a great operation environment is created.
