I do not want neither i or anyone's i know want BF to go back to 64 players we rather have 256 players ...
You are free to choose the 64 players options if you want we dont want to be forced in your small scale wars ! thanks !
Why not both?
as i recall there as always been a 64 version and a 128 version of maps .. so yeah
I want all the BIG maps with 64 players. Less chaos. Also: no crossplay between consoles and PC!!! I dare to dream.
@Stew360256 players on Zavod? LOL!!! Good luck with that. As regular player of MAG on PS3 and Planetside 2, I'm all about larger battles. But the maps and game have to be designed to handle it. Battlefield 2042 is not. They are just stuffing an extra 64 players into maps that aren't big enough.
And 64 player versions? First off they often have used it as just an LTM. Second, its not better because they pull out a lot of the playable area. So 64 players get stuffed into maps that should be for 32, with the exception of the Portal maps, Spearhead, Stranded, and maybe the Season 4 map. Hopefully this Zavod remake as well.
@Ironhead841@GrizzGolf Exactly. Why not both? At least give it a shot to see how 64 players play out on the BIG maps. My guess is it will be much like Dragon Valley or Golmud Railway on BF4. Perfectly fine.
