So because something disproves your words, it's nonsense?
Collector's editions are NOT what is called a "full price game". Your ignorance is not something you should be using in an argument in the future.
60 EUR games are full price games. Overwatch, Battlefield, DevilMayCry, Assassin's Creed, etc.
The special, deluxe, ultimate, collector's editions are beyond that.
I will repeat the part that you seemingly missed in my previous message, but with a different example. I bought Battlefield 4 + Premium (CD Keys) for a total of 60 EUR, again about a month after they got released. I have unlocked almost everything in there and spent over 1000 hours in that game. I still play it from time to time, because it is an excellent shooter.
In Apex, I couldn't even get a fraction of the unlockables for that money. It's frankly exraordinary to me how some people get screwed by a game and will still defend it against arguments which are clearly and objectively good. I am targeting you with that statement.
I would rather pay a single, reasonable price and play the game normally, get a box at each level and be able to also use the ingame currency to unlock everything. The same way it is in Overwatch. While blizzard's game is bad and a total mess, they at least got the whole "lootbox" thing right.
EA invented the "lootbox" and yet still haven't figured out a way to make them fair and lucrative at the same time.
How about my Overwatch example? 60 EUR and over 150 skins so far, plus new maps, plus new characters. Stop trying to tap-dance around the facts. This monetization is not acceptable. Either make it so that people can earn things continueously by playing, or make it a normal paid game and then let me unlock everything.
I stand by my reasonable statement - this system is not satisfactory and definitely not well-made.
