A little talk about Canister Shell (MBTank)
Hi everybody. I'm aware there are more important and more interesting topics regarding tanks, but I would like to spend a few words on this topic. Canister Shell is an ammunition with great potential...
Forum Discussion
Thank you for the interesting topic!
I assume we are talking about the BF4 MBT canister shot. I think maybe there is a misconception that it being a shot gun style weapon means it is intended for cqc. And while you can certainly use it for that purpose provided your aim is steady the Canister shot is really more of a 25-80m weapon. It's advantage is that it can OHK enemies in that range and that is a big advantage over the LMG and HMG. The reason why is that with LMG/HMG the enemy at those ranges can run into cover before you can finish them off. Canister shell works wonders against enemies peaking out of cover to take RPG shots at you too. If I recall correctly the canister shell also murdered atv's, jet skis and jeeps and did significant damage to helicopters and jets whereas the LMG was infective against them.
Given it's slow ROF though it is as you mentioned not at all suited for cqc and for those maps the LMG is a much better fit. They all have their spaces:
LMG: CQC king
HMG: All around - Much higher ROF than canister but significantly lower ROF then LMG (also damages light armored vehicles)
Canister: OHK out to about 80m, fast projectile velocity and does damage to light armor
the ap shell does a better job imo.....
- @RNM4010028 exactly; AP can cover its niche... and considering AP + HMG combo, it's just a better option.
@rainkloud thanks mate!
From one side, you are right. Canister is probably meant for the mid range and it has a good potential (in fact I started the thread by saying that).
From the other side, I still find there is a problem. Since, as mentioned, we both agree that HMG and Canister (let's reduce the equation to these two factors to make it easy, because on LMG there would be more to say) are different weapons, designed for different contexts, and with already mutual advantages/disadvantages... so why, after firing a shot with the main gun, HMG is immediately ready while Canister nope? Yet they are both secondary weapons!
If the answer (from DICE) is purely a question of historical/realty fidelity (I mean: the soldiers in the tank must have the time to charge the new shell in the barrel)... I reply, to DICE, that BF isn't a simulation... and that moreover it would be enough let the shot to start from a secondary smaller cannon.
If the answer is about balancing, then I say: since Canister already has its penalties compared to an HMG (slower RoF, less versatile, more risky, more precision needed, worse in close range) that make it balanced with pro e c ons... why should it also be penalized by the shared reload? It's such an additional malus (and anyway, if DICE really didn't like this, it' would be better just a small nerf than the shared realod times)!
Don't ger me wrong: it's fair that it has a long cooldown, but at least let it be disconnected to that of the main gun. Because, as interesting as Canister may be, halving your arsenal is not acceptable.
@astroVBThis video says pretty much everything I wanted to say but probably does a better job and also brings up a powerful point I neglected to mention: To mitigate the load time issue you have the Auto Loader spec and to provide cover fire you have the top gunner.
The Canister Shell is a high risk/ high reward weapon and thrives in a *particular environment under specific conditions*. I think eliminating the load time would diminish the value of Auto Loader upgrade as well as the HMG/LMG.
All of the penalties you listed are a reasonable price to pay for having very good range and most importantly the OHK capability. Being able to reliably count on killing enemies in certain positions let's you quickly transition to and focus on the task and keep your situational awareness up.I was at the Tank Museum yesterday (Bovington) and saw the nasty looking Canister round next to the Chally 1. Quite a beast of a round and would ruin an infantry platoons day.
@astroVB Canister is not a secondary weapon, it is an alternative round fired out of the main gun. This is similar to firing a HE, SABOT or STAFF round.
When you swap to MG, you are changing weapon not ammunition type. The best analogy is that swapping between main gun and MG is like an infantryman swapping between primary and pistol. Swapping between standard AT round and Canister is like an infantryman using a shotgun swapping to slug/dart/frag round, they have to reload (yes I know they are attachments in the game, but what would happen for real).
- @Rusty Rat that's the problem: it's a primary weapon, as you rightly say, but it occupies the secondary slot. This implies that it halves your arsenal. Instead of having X weapons and Y... you have X OR Y.
