Battlefield 2042 - Overprice Russian segment

The Ultimate price is high for everyone.

I have yet to meet a single sane person that is willing to pay that much for a few cosmetics.

Well, this is not an exclusive for the console, and the differences with the first version of frostbite are minimal, or maybe not at all, as was the case with the previous part of the battle (I was surprised, the destructibility remained unchanged since bf bc2, and shots through static objects appeared as a plus such as ground).

So I just want people to turn on their heads and think if the game is worth the money and think and see how games are created.

Ps. I understand that there are those who just do not care about the price, and they are ready to take games for both $ 200 and $ 1000.

@F3NN3XUltimate purchased in Norway was roughly US$120 i believe, I'm guessing he means ultimate rather than deluxe, so in that case 8750r (rounded up on the 50) if he bought it in Norway.

Or he means it's an extra 1000r from standard to deluxe, i'm honestly slightly confused as well.

I can't figure out if he feels there should be a discount based on some kind of console exclusivity (afaik there isn't) or because the game engine isn't built from scratch for each game or if it's the price itself that's the problem.

I believe, and I could well be wrong, that they're asking for region based pricing. Don't think that's something which will happen though, based on when people have asked for this in the past. 

Yea yea! Frostbite 1.5 and Frostbite 3 not far apart.When this year I played bf 1 and after a little in bf 5, I was very surprised at the quality of the destruction of buildings. The quality of destructibility remained practically unchanged. those. Suppose in bf bc2 one plate collapsed into two parts, then in the last parts it collapses in the same way, into 4 parts. excellent progress in 7-8 years.

So you played beta, and what do you think? Is this game worth that much money? is the cost justified?