Forum Discussion
@lzilchetl wrote:We still do not know details about HZ... do you think that there will be some surprises there?
No, I don't believe that, in my opinion Hazard Zone is the core part of Battlefield 2042, and I assume it will work, and may need a couple tweaks and balancing, which may easily be addressed with a large testing crowd to gather performance data. Like a Beta 😉
I don't think Crossplay is the issue, because I guess that would be something that could be added at a later time.
My candidate is "All-out Warfare", I think and hope there may be surprises there.
@kregora wrote:My candidate is "All-out Warfare", I think and hope there may be surprises there.
PvE?
- off3nc34 years agoRising Adventurer
This gives me BF V vibes all over again and that's a very bad thing. Not hyped for it anymore after playing that test at 30 fps and now this delay , maybe i'll pick it up later down the line after some reviews. Things ain't looking too bright for this title , the game is nowhere finished.
And the radio silence from them was the icing on the cake.
- OkamiToge4 years agoSeasoned Ace
Playstation and Xbox stores both haven't updated to the delay date at all.
- kregora4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@lzilchetl wrote:
@kregora wrote:My candidate is "All-out Warfare", I think and hope there may be surprises there.
PvE?
PvP. "All-out Warfare" is the part of the game, which for me resembles the "Battefield" experience. 128-player Conquest, Breakthrough maybe Rush.
This is what I expect, when I think about a Battlefield game.
And sadly that is the part of the game where I see the most conceptional issues.
That is what Can we get rid of specialists please and This is not Battlefield are about.
- lzilchetl4 years agoSeasoned Ace@kregora Gawd! You think they may revise the specialists and maybe off-line play? That would make me need to eat my words!
- ninjapenquinuk4 years agoSeasoned Ace@lzilchetl sadly i cant see them getting rid of the idea, but maybe they could use the time to have different characters for the 2 factions at least.