Forum Discussion
I’m sure GFN has been bugging EA to get their hands on it. I think eventually it will be considering BF1 made its way already there. However I don’t think it’ll be any time soon. EA is probably going to want to make as much money as they can during the first couple months of launch with their core-advertised consoles and platforms
- 4 years ago
Wouldn't they make more money though if they opened it up for Geforce Now? You still need to purchase a copy of the game. I would pre-purchase it today if I knew it was coming to Geforce now.
- 4 years ago
Yes. No one ever thinks about that part for some reason or the idea of access and what it means for purchases. Anyone with a negative argument against geforce now is braindead. money is money. You literally still sign in on EA. Its just shocking at this point how ridiculous people are.
- 4 years ago
I understand your point, however, Nvidia Geforce NOW isn't some all access subscription service. Players are required to purchase the game on origin or steam to even stream it, so the actual truth is that DICE and EA will be losing money by not doing it. There are tens if not hundreds of thousands of players that utilize GFN simply because they want adequate performance without buying a new rig. This allows those players to purchase games like 2042 that they otherwise wouldn't because their systems don't quite give them the necessary performance. To me, I only see upside by adding the game, for Nvidia, EA, DICE, and players alike. I can personally say I have spent hundreds on titles I wouldn't have otherwise purchased without GFN, and 2042 would certainly be another example of that if given the opportunity to play on GFN.
- 4 years ago@AnonimityEngaged My previous comment was directed at the first page of responses, not sphresa and jboydni