Battlefield identity crisis
I think battlefield has an identity crisis going on. Times are changing and they are trying to make money. People have different demands these days. As I see it, they need to choose between two scen...
Forum Discussion
I think Dice should not listen to anyone and stick to who they are (If they still can) which is: a company that developed large scale vehicle+infantry combined arms FPS games.
The question is: do gamers still want that? If yes, then why so many players did not like the original Hourglass? Or why is Renewal, Exposure, Break Away etc not good for people?
I think those maps are everything that Battlefield stands for. What was the problem? The specialists? They got back almost all legacy features except the server browser. Would gamers like the original Hourglass if there would be a server browser in the game and proper factions? Honestly the original Hourglass was soooooo Battlefield for me.
Reclaimed, Haven, Stadium, even Redacted is sooooo COD. What gives? What do people want? Dice does not know anymore. As someone above said: they need to pick a lane.
As a firm soldier class enthusiast, I've explained here as detailed as possible what I want from next game. Also personal weapon wishlist can be found there in general section. Comments regarding returning back to more Classic era of Battlefield where teamwork mattered (meaning synergy, community features, communication, chain of command, handicapless game mechanics etc.). Instead of getting play as you want approach with huge customisation potential and perk support systems and automated features.
These are my two cents. I'm out but probably not heard because they'll do another Battlefield 4 clone at best which I am not going to buy. It will once again has boring, uninspiring and highly customisable 4 class system like Call of Duty DNA infecting and injected to roots of Battlefield. Just predicting worst outcome 🙈
