Forum Discussion
@Agent10_Alex написал (-а):Lol welcome to 2042. No one is cheating. I have 1300 hours and can only recall 2 cheaters. The average Conquest all chat will have you believing 22-12 TimmyTom0826 on the other team is cheating about 4 times a day however.
I immediately realized that those who believe that there are no cheaters in the game are playing the dull Conquest mode. Play the normal Breakthrough mode and you will see cheaters on a regular basis. With k/d ratio like 90/6 for ex.
That's not cheating. That's quite normal. I've seen people go 60-0 regularly. There's many reasons why that happens, and its not cheaters. You literally have no proof of your claim, and in fact I bet if you posted the stats of the people you are accusing of cheating, their HS% is in the 20s. I guarantee it.
- flcrm2 years agoRising Veteran
[Screenshot removed: Don't "name and shame."]
On what basis can you say that this is not cheating if you have no other explanation? What does HS% have to do with it?
Ок, can you explain such k/d ratio 92/3?
I made this screenshot on the same day as the previous post.
I can give you a lot of such screenshots. It's just that you don't play, as I understand it, and you don't know what's really going on.
- Alethes2 years agoSeasoned Ace@flcrm I also play only Breakthrough and Rush (I cannot stand Conquest for the same reasons as you mentioned) and I regularly get scores like those you screenshot'ed; and I certainly don't cheat. On a very good match I can get 70 to 80 kills and die between 10 to 20 times. And I do not consider myself to be a top player.
Signs of cheating, to me, are very obvious: E.S.P., wallhacking and statistical imbalance towards headshots.
BFV is rife with it; 2042 I can count with my hands the number of times I perceived it—not many.- flcrm2 years agoRising Veteran
@TheseusJason написал (-а):
@flcrmI also play only Breakthrough and Rush (I cannot stand Conquest for the same reasons as you mentioned) and I regularly get scores like those you screenshot'ed; and I certainly don't cheat. On a very good match I can get 70 to 80 kills and die between 10 to 20 times. And I do not consider myself to be a top player.
Signs of cheating, to me, are very obvious: E.S.P., wallhacking and statistical imbalance towards headshots.
BFV is rife with it; 2042 I can count with my hands the number of times I perceived it—not many.As a result, he had more than 100 kills. I also sometimes did something like 85/15, but very rarely. So don't tell me what 100/6 can do without cheats. To make a lot of kills, you need to actively rush. But this entails a large number of deaths, because a large number of people sit in ambush and wait for you to run past to shoot you in the back or you can get caught in the crossfire.
The main thing in the cheats is not an aimbot at all, but a wallhack, because you can see all the enemies and you can choose such a route to kill everyone one by one without being accidentally killed from an ambush or under crossfire. And aimbot is an add-on for the very crooked. If you do not understand the elementary, then it is clear that you will not see any cheats and abnormal k/d ratio will not make you think.
P.S. What statistical imbalance in the direction of headshots do you consider to be an indicator of the use of an aimbot?
P.P.S. If there is a free cheat and the anti-cheat does not work, how many people are there who are ready to cheat? That's right, a lot. I see them regularly.
- 2 years ago
@flcrm If you are talking about cheaters, and you say this - "What does HS% have to do with it?" - that tells everyone else all we need to know. 92-3 is your claim for a cheater...? Then you want to say - "It's just that you don't play, as I understand it, and you don't know what's really going on." - So you don't understand that, just the same as you don't understand cheaters, you just come to very ridiculous conclusions. I don't play, right? And you do, and that's why you can't fathom how anyone could go 92-3.
- lepelaar152 years agoNew Traveler
[Removed: Don't "name and shame."]