Forum Discussion
[Screenshot removed: Don't "name and shame."]
On what basis can you say that this is not cheating if you have no other explanation? What does HS% have to do with it?
Ок, can you explain such k/d ratio 92/3?
I made this screenshot on the same day as the previous post.
I can give you a lot of such screenshots. It's just that you don't play, as I understand it, and you don't know what's really going on.
Signs of cheating, to me, are very obvious: E.S.P., wallhacking and statistical imbalance towards headshots.
BFV is rife with it; 2042 I can count with my hands the number of times I perceived it—not many.
- flcrm2 years agoRising Veteran
@TheseusJason написал (-а):
@flcrmI also play only Breakthrough and Rush (I cannot stand Conquest for the same reasons as you mentioned) and I regularly get scores like those you screenshot'ed; and I certainly don't cheat. On a very good match I can get 70 to 80 kills and die between 10 to 20 times. And I do not consider myself to be a top player.
Signs of cheating, to me, are very obvious: E.S.P., wallhacking and statistical imbalance towards headshots.
BFV is rife with it; 2042 I can count with my hands the number of times I perceived it—not many.As a result, he had more than 100 kills. I also sometimes did something like 85/15, but very rarely. So don't tell me what 100/6 can do without cheats. To make a lot of kills, you need to actively rush. But this entails a large number of deaths, because a large number of people sit in ambush and wait for you to run past to shoot you in the back or you can get caught in the crossfire.
The main thing in the cheats is not an aimbot at all, but a wallhack, because you can see all the enemies and you can choose such a route to kill everyone one by one without being accidentally killed from an ambush or under crossfire. And aimbot is an add-on for the very crooked. If you do not understand the elementary, then it is clear that you will not see any cheats and abnormal k/d ratio will not make you think.
P.S. What statistical imbalance in the direction of headshots do you consider to be an indicator of the use of an aimbot?
P.P.S. If there is a free cheat and the anti-cheat does not work, how many people are there who are ready to cheat? That's right, a lot. I see them regularly.
- Alethes2 years agoSeasoned Ace@flcrm I never said there are no cheaters in 2042. I reiterate that I've only perceived a few. I play BFV a lot and can intuitively tell who's cheating—due to unrealistic kills and performance. How can it be that I can tell the difference in BFV but not in 2042?...
Also, I find it much easier to rack plenty of kills in 2042 than in BFV.
There have been some players getting 100-120 kills and only 5-10 deaths. Evidence of cheating is circumstantial based only on K/D. Maybe they're just exceptional players...? Not everyone has the same skill and/or time and willingness to practice.
I only start finding it strange when odd things happen. E.g. the same player consistently knowing where everyone is (as you described); unrealistic reflex times (less than ~0,15/0,2 sec.) on a 1v1; percentage of headshots above ~20%; bullets finding me behind objects, clearly without LoS; and the trophy one: spawn where there are no spawn beacons neither teammates neither point being capped. (Last week there was a guy spawning in that little recess in point B in 'Op. Underground' while there were 5 of us capping the point, no spawn beacon (we had checked beforehand), and he just spawned there out of the blue—I saw it myself as I was right next to it. In BF1 there was a guy running around invisible (there are YT vids showing it).