Forum Discussion

KRUPPSturmWaffe's avatar
4 years ago

BF 2042 is BAD! WHY?!

Worst main battlefield ever.

And that's a shame. Because there are good approaches. The more free "class" option, for example, that you can choose your tools as you want. The maps are all different in terms of their basic theme, no 3 desert maps, etc. Portal naturally has the most potential. And an Escape from Tarkov at AAA level? Why not! The truth is, nothing works properly, despite the portal, the game has hardly any content and basic features are missing. The game was released 6-12 months early.

There are 2 game modes in 2042: Breakthrough and Conquest. The former can be completely forgotten. You can tell immediately that the cards are not designed for it. Put a point on the roof of a skyscraper? With 64 vs. 64 players? No fun. A purest cluster *. It's worse than Operation Metro. Conquest itself has its moments. If you defend a position for a long time it can be fun. But the problem is: on many maps, the walking paths are far too far and the area far too flat. Result: You are constantly being shot at from everywhere or, alternatively, run over by the filthy hovercraft. The biggest threat in the game is not the guns, but getting run over. Wow! The cards themselves have also been designed to be quite lazy. On almost every map you can find mountains of containers, Manifest is basically just a pure container map. What is the characteristic of containers? You are indestructible. The entire destruction engine took at least 3 steps backwards. We were promised "Next-Gen-Destruction", we got a destruction on a higher PS2 level. 

Then the big single-player replacement: bots. Do you still know cyberpunk, the AI? Did you think it was bad? Then first play against bots. They prefer to fight 2 meters from the flag than in the capture area. Do not use air artillery. Don't respond to commands. Have no skills either. The own team reacts extra stupidly, instead of respawning, they prefer to wait to be revived by a medi (who does not come). If you get the idea to get BF2042 just because of the bot matches: finger off. And who thinks the bots don't matter anyway: They also appear in multiplayer and especially in the portal.

Speaking of the portal: an idea is good. Dictionary lousy. First of all you have to be lucky that not all servers are occupied, otherwise you cannot start your own server. Second, there are so far more server corpses or farm servers than really creative ideas. Whether really good modes will be created remains to be seen. If the number of players drops quickly (which I believe) the mode will stay dead. In addition, 2 cards each for 1942, BC2 and BF3 are far too few. Conquest in 1942 on the same two maps that are still boring? Not so great. In addition, almost every progression in Portal has been "temporarily" deactivated.

Then the gunplay and the technical condition: performance is poor, there is no other way to describe it. At the same time, the overall graphic is maximally "nice". Would even call it uglier than Battlefield 5. The game is of course still buggy, not as bad as the beta, but bugs and game breaking bugs still occur. And then all the mistakes. Gunplay is broken, the vehicle controls are bad (2 Need for Speed ​​Studios, Ghost Games and Criterion worked on it. Think about it), spawns bad, unbalanced as always. Then the game with 7 cards in 2042, a few weapons, ONE drone (the dog), a few vehicles and no watercraft has far too little content. There is no single player campaign, server browser, voice chat, etc.

I think that should be enough. It should be clear that the game is not worth 60 euros in this condition. Wait 6 months, see if the biggest problems have been resolved, then it will definitely be for 30 euros. That would be a fair price for this half-baked game.

17 Replies


  • @-DFA-Thump wrote:

    @WelshWilksIt's because EA/DICE killed progression in portal when they realized it was taking people away from their microtransaction specialist scheme


    No they killed progression because the usual exploiters created XP farming servers.

    Turns out most people don't want to play dated battlefield games when they have a brand new shiny one to play instead.

  • TickTack121's avatar
    TickTack121
    4 years ago

    @Tank2042Man wrote:

    @-DFA-Thump wrote:

    @WelshWilksIt's because EA/DICE killed progression in portal when they realized it was taking people away from their microtransaction specialist scheme


    No they killed progression because the usual exploiters created XP farming servers.

    Turns out most people don't want to play dated battlefield games when they have a brand new shiny one to play instead.


    Can you Please Stop Spamming in every post just to insult People?

    Easy Solution for farming: No XP or lese XP for different settings and parameters in Portal. Problem solved. Turn up the damage modifier by 50%? Get 50% lese XP.

  • DaMutha1's avatar
    DaMutha1
    Seasoned Ace
    4 years ago

    Last time I checked, there's nothing currently for sale in the store.  So please take your "microtransations, reeeeeeee" somewhere else.

  • Machinates's avatar
    Machinates
    4 years ago

    If you don't take the time to match ADS, with where the shots ACTUALLY hit, you don't know how bad this game is. This many people should never be talking how bad a BF game is... but they are

  • ace_wolf08's avatar
    ace_wolf08
    Seasoned Adventurer
    3 years ago

    ...because we shouldn't have to go tonan alternative mode just okay an actual Battlefield game?

    Because the BF3/BC2 factions have everything unlocked for them, there is no progression what so ever. We can't use the 2042 era stuff either those factions. The classes are still stuck in the 2042 mindset of only having one gadget slot for us to pick from..

    You have to buy into the battle pass to get a persistent server, the list goes on.

    2042 might be a fun hero shooter...but it is a disgrace of a Battlefield game. Hardline is better, just on principle because it still had the traditional Battlefield formula. Same with 5...

  • ace_wolf08's avatar
    ace_wolf08
    Seasoned Adventurer
    3 years ago

    No, just remove XP from AI kills...simple.

    No need to punish those who want to play Hardcore.

    Just either remove xp gains from servers who have AI enabled...or enabled not as filler. Or just remove xp from any bot kill you get.. ' not actually subtracting your xp, just no xp for bot kills '

    But honestly, there are more issues wrong with Portal then the lack of XP 

    Gotta buy into a battle pass just to get persistent servers. Fine, if I plan on using the Battle Pass... but not if I don't plan on it..

    The class system is still based off of 2042s system, where we only get to pick one gadget, instead of the 2 how we always had it.

    Furthermore, everything is already unlocked for the older eras...so progression is pointless. Especially sense the older eras can't even use the 2042 stuff they unlock.

    Seriously, our ONLY gripe about the game is the stupid specialists and the lack of real classes and real soldiers.

    I would be fine if the BF3 and BC2 factions could use the 2042 era weapons, gadgets and vehicles and actually progress through the unlocks and such for them.. 

    Cause atleast then it would make sense playing it. Considering portal hasn't even gotten 1 new legacy map sense launch...the most we can play on are 2042 maps ' most as in the amount of maps available ' so we might as well get to use 2042 weapons and stuff. After all, Portal is suppose to be a ' sandbox ' isn't it? -.-

Featured Places