Forum Discussion

Stew360's avatar
Stew360
4 years ago

BF3 wasnt a " Bad game " like COD arena But BF2042 is a true Combine arms BF

The narative against BF2042 as got to new height of disingenuousity Some calling rumors spread by made up " gaming journalist " as truth and so on  But the reality is BFBC or BF3 were way more of a...
discussion
NiCeDiCe90's avatar
NiCeDiCe90
4 years ago
@Blackidus We have to admit here that BF3 maps were pretty much designed for specific game modes. Coming from BC2 you could clearly see what they had in mind for the maps.
So maps like Metro or Damavand peak are nice on Rush 32p and were not meant to be played CQ 64p... But players asked for it so it became a thing.
That's ok for me but we can't blame Metro for being a bad map when it's most popular mode is not the intended way to play it.
It's an actual awesome map on rush 32p that can compete with BC2 Maps without a doubt.
Stew360's avatar
Stew360
4 years ago

@NiCeDiCe90Its the same thing with Conquest maps being used for " breaktrough " it simply " break the maps ...

BF2042 was clearly designed for Conquest in mind and its the way BF2042 is the most fun 128 players conquest .. Even the 64 players maps feel wrong and does not offer the same experience at all and its why i exclusively play 2042 128 players conquest .

Those maps could also work for BF2142 " Titan mode " , but still i find some areas of the maps problematics between objective .. but there is also part of the maps that are insanely amasing .. like D1D2 C1 part in discarded is so good . Manifest as a whole is good to me a lot of double points bases are great in many maps ..

But suprisingly conquest maps used as " Hazardzone maps " were working great for that game type 

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,988 PostsLatest Activity: 3 days ago