@DuaneDibbley wrote:
@Psubond
I'm sorry that you did not get the point I was trying to make in my post. Maybe read it again?
Not sure if you just want to troll (in which case I will ignore you) or are you really failing to grasp the difference between the freedom to have fun and imposing certain RULES OF GAME. Just in case you are really not getting it, let me give you an example that is more Battlefield related (I neither play poker nor do I have any interest in either F1 nor football -- even if this might sound strange considering I am German 😉 ):
Just consider this: Do YOU consider it a sensible thing to do or a 'violation of your freedom' if we impose a limit of the number of tanks/helis? Would you rather think it is a good idea to allow for 64 tanks per side to be on the battlefield at once? Would this be a good idea or do you feel it is restricting your freedom?
There are good reasons to impose rules on a game. I will not explain to you in detail why classes with distinct roles are superior to specialists that can take an ammo crate and a med pen at the same time as this has been done before many times different threads already. The 'benefit' specialists bring is to discourage team play and encourage a lone wolf play style. Not what the vast majority of us want and definitely NOT Battlefield.
