Bigger Squads - Conversations
Does anyone else wish Squads were bigger than 4 people?
Especially considering the size of teams in this game, finding any friends who couldn't fit into your squad will be a nightmare.
I neve...
Forum Discussion
Battlefield REALLY need better squads size , in 128 players match squads of 4 is way to low and does not allow for good and organized group to make a difference . We NEED at least 8 players squads and Lobby so we can have more friends and have better chance to do any difference into a match ..
A solution if Dice want to keep squads respawn manageable with 4 they could do 2 fireteam of 4 insde a squad of 8 and 2 squads of 8 to make a platoon of 16 and 4 platoons per team ... Fireteam have the BF respawn capability inside their own fireteam yet they are part of a squad of 8 that can create lobby and join games toghueter
Also Team Leaders need tools to communicate similar to planetside 2 command chanels where squads leaders can speak to each others and organise better , this structure is deeply lacking
in previous BF games and problem will be exacerbate with the increased players count things are to randoms and there is no real team work happening unless you play private servers with the control over the team composition etc..
So We NEED 8 players Squads and lobby to invite 7 friends or team mates willing to play
We need command chanels for squads leaders and maybe even a platoons structure of 16 players per plattoon so 4 platoon per team of 64
Also We need an option to kick out undesirable peoples from 2 seat vehicules like tanks
a SIMILAR Platoon structure is needed for BF 2042 128 players modes
The problem with large squads its hard to get 4 to play together, 8 would take an act of congess.
- @DDouble_Tap02 I think its because Battlefield has been doing a poor job promoting squad play. For most, it's just a place they get dumped to play the game. There's no discernable structure for players to lean in to.
In games like MAG and Planetside 2, the command structure is an obvious and integral part of the game. Players know they are part of something bigger, and gravitate towards playing that way. Squad leaders, Platoon leaders, and commanders are typically active and on the mics.I prefer to stick with my squad. You die less for certain and it's really the only way to truly dominate. Situation awareness is important, the small talk is what frustrates me about some squads. If people are made aware of squad etiquette, I think it would be a better experience for everyone.
@ArchAngeL-PCX wrote:
@DDouble_Tap02I think its because Battlefield has been doing a poor job promoting squad play. For most, it's just a place they get dumped to play the game. There's no discernable structure for players to lean in to.
In games like MAG and Planetside 2, the command structure is an obvious and integral part of the game. Players know they are part of something bigger, and gravitate towards playing that way. Squad leaders, Platoon leaders, and commanders are typically active and on the mics.
