Forum Discussion
4 years ago
The problem with large squads its hard to get 4 to play together, 8 would take an act of congess.
4 years ago
@DDouble_Tap02 I think its because Battlefield has been doing a poor job promoting squad play. For most, it's just a place they get dumped to play the game. There's no discernable structure for players to lean in to.
In games like MAG and Planetside 2, the command structure is an obvious and integral part of the game. Players know they are part of something bigger, and gravitate towards playing that way. Squad leaders, Platoon leaders, and commanders are typically active and on the mics.
In games like MAG and Planetside 2, the command structure is an obvious and integral part of the game. Players know they are part of something bigger, and gravitate towards playing that way. Squad leaders, Platoon leaders, and commanders are typically active and on the mics.
- 4 years ago
I prefer to stick with my squad. You die less for certain and it's really the only way to truly dominate. Situation awareness is important, the small talk is what frustrates me about some squads. If people are made aware of squad etiquette, I think it would be a better experience for everyone.
@ArchAngeL-PCX wrote:
@DDouble_Tap02I think its because Battlefield has been doing a poor job promoting squad play. For most, it's just a place they get dumped to play the game. There's no discernable structure for players to lean in to.
In games like MAG and Planetside 2, the command structure is an obvious and integral part of the game. Players know they are part of something bigger, and gravitate towards playing that way. Squad leaders, Platoon leaders, and commanders are typically active and on the mics.