Forum Discussion
Trokey66
4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@afa20f13a0993a51ebc53e7cf97ebfba sorry?
My preffered squad size is 5 but at no point have I said I'm against 8 however:
If you consistently have 8 mates, great crack on.
What happens if you have 9 mates or only 5 or 6?
I just think 8 man squads will cause just as many issues that it will cure.
Either way more than 4 is required.
My preffered squad size is 5 but at no point have I said I'm against 8 however:
If you consistently have 8 mates, great crack on.
What happens if you have 9 mates or only 5 or 6?
I just think 8 man squads will cause just as many issues that it will cure.
Either way more than 4 is required.
4 years ago
@Trokey66 Dude you can't say "I said I'm not against 8"
And then say "I just think 8 man squads will cause just as many issues that it will cure."
Your either for you against what we are talking about stand with it or stand against have some integrity. You want 5 then shut up about 8 and stand for 5. I disagree and we can talk about it.
None of this wishy washy both ways nonsense. Protip: DICE is either going to do it or they are not going to. They aren't going to not and it and do it.
It's like saying "I'm not racist but" just take a position and don't pretend to be happy.
- Trokey664 years agoSeasoned Ace@afa20f13a0993a51ebc53e7cf97ebfba By the God's you're hard work.
I prefer 5 man squads.
If there were to be 8 man squads it would not bother me, it would still be better than 4 but, I won't DEMAND 8 man squads like you and others are because of the reasons I have set out.
Not being actively for something doesn't automatically mean I'm dead against it. Why is this such a difficult concept for you to grasp?
I prefer red heads (5) but wouldn't be upset with a brunette or blonde (8) but definitely don't want a lady boy (4).