Solved
Forum Discussion
14 Replies
- @DiceUprise it been done twice how about others or even new location.
How about Uluru, Upper Amzon, Ganges Delta, Heard Island, Victoria Falls, Mount Kilimanjaro, Mount Fuji or Fiji. why not? because it is a bad map, that's why not.
- @DingoKillr With the size of the new maps (around 5km², or so) DICE could very easily implement some of the maps from the past 15 or so years into the new ones seamlessly and still have a ton of room left over for brand new scenarios. They don't even have to be whole recreations either, just reimagined objectives from other games carefully crafted into the new maps.
I can't imagine a map designed for 32 players will work well with 128.
"Reimagined" implies being adapted to the current gen.
My bet is that they might bring it down the line as they did in BF4 and BFV. They dont want to only appeal to Veterans, they are also looking to expand further, showing new stuff with some of the old moments is better for PR.
New maps New location , iam tired of nostalgia already ... Metro 24/7 and others farming maps already got old 10 years old so i wish to see new battleground new maps new experiences 🙏
- @TheGM86 What is bad about it. Good mix of infantry and vehicle combat. Good sized map. Obviously too small for 128 players but worked well with 64.
I wouldn't necessarily want it back but find it odd to be called a 'bad map' - @DiceUprise The only map I want back is Strike at Karkand, still one of my favourite BF infantry maps
Imagine the possibilites... Seine Crossing, Operation Underground & Amiens merged into one big clusterpluck of a map with below & above ground combat...
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,960 PostsLatest Activity: 30 minutes ago
Recent Discussions
- 30 minutes ago
- 8 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 2 days ago