Delta Force Hawk Ops vs. Battlefield 2042

Delta Force alpha test has now been delayed....

Dice-Dont be sad. This is how things workouts sometimes

"A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad." - Shigeru Miyamoto

One particular thing nobody seems yet to be talking about is character physics. Those seem to be about right that you can't spam slide, jump or crouch to evade bullets. Your character actually has a sense of weight which many otherwise decent games don't have these days.

---

@Hudson1531 wrote:

"A delayed game is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad." - Shigeru Miyamoto

---

My God is this so true!

Will ppl who dont like specialists, will they play Delta Force?

Whats wrong with specialists?

---

@MoeGunnzz219 wrote:

Whats wrong with specialists?

---

Nothing wrong with them, as long as they are not in a Battlefield game!

@Estynytapa_Haiku

Although Delta Force Hawk Ops is a Battlefield clone, it looks more like a Battlefield.

War atmosphere and movement speed are better, easy to take cover, the maps are better designed.

There are still operators, but there are no soldiers with strange outfits.

I wish it was paid, they would pay more attention to the game.

I will definitely play Delta Force Hawk Ops, my only concern is cheating and server issues.

DICE has a powerful engine like Frostbite, they could make masterpiece Battlefield games if they want.

I hope DICE sees these and learns from them and the next Battlefield will be as great as Battlefield 4 and Battlefield 1.

In the next Battlefield game, specialists must be removed and there must be at least 4 factions with more maps.

A video showing the destruction: 

In short - no craters, a looot of things are not destructible (not even chainlink fences are knifable).