Dynamic team balancing system
Lots of previous BF games lack good team balancing system which would result in extremely one-sided game that the tickets count of winning and losing team would be something like 1000/200. We all kno...
Forum Discussion
Player level isn't necessarily a proper indicator of actual skill, just time spent playing. A lot of people didn't appreciate the automatic ticket balancing of previous titles so I kind of doubt it'll make a return - of course you never know
This is why I said the dynamic balancing system should be optional like normal/hardcore mode. That players can choose to join server with or without dynamic balancing system if available. Anyway I just hate spending more time on trying to find a balanced server than actually playing the game (in BC2, BF3&4).
- @TTZ_Dipsy Yeah but if you are higher level you should have a better understanding of the game and play better.
"Player level isn't necessarily a proper indicator of actual skill, just time spent playing. A lot of people didn't appreciate the automatic ticket balancing of previous titles so I kind of doubt it'll make a return - of course you never know"
Technicaly true but proven false by BFv. The team with all the level 100 are SO MUCH better than the team with the level 10. All the games in BFv were like that.
- @DAYLEET Level to an extent is a useful tool. A level 100 will be better than a level 10, probably at least 9/10 due to map/weapon knowledge and general game experience in the time it's taken to get there. You get to level 10 in about 5mins and level 100 takes many many hours. When Level gets less useful, is telling apart a level 50 with a 100, or a level 100 to a level 200. This is just time served rather than indicating any actual 'skill'
Featured Places
