Dynamic team balancing system
Lots of previous BF games lack good team balancing system which would result in extremely one-sided game that the tickets count of winning and losing team would be something like 1000/200. We all kno...
Forum Discussion
We dont need dynamic balancing prolonging a one sided round. Its better a lopsided round ended in 10 mins, than dragging out for 20 with 19 times out of 20 exactly the same end result.
@ninjapenquinuk I’m assuming you like playing games 20 v 10 being on the losing side then ?
- @Hudson009 Catch up mechanics are hand holding for (everyones a winner) 12 year olds. Games dont end 20v10, from a near full server. They may start a round like that, and thats an issue all on its own. A part of the problem is players attitudes. They have are involved in one bad round and just quit. Join another server and rinse and repeat. If players hung around, balancing would be easier. Quite often at the moment in BFV, i can join a server mid round and be involved in a blow out, yet next round is a lot closer, and even a reversal. Now i dont know if thats DICE balancing or because of the player turnover from rage quitting or what, but im finding its rare to have more than one complete walkover in a row, Yes, several wins or loses, but not massive victories/defeats.
I’ve played on the oceanic servers with BF5 and I can tell you I’ve had rounds were the teams didn’t get balanced and we lost due to considerable numbers not on our side.
Featured Places
